Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Dowry Prohibition Act Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Matrimonial Dispute Resolved Amicably, Complainant No Longer Wishes to Prosecute, Continuation of Proceedings Would Be Abuse of Process Under Section 482 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) by applicants nos. 4 and 5, Godawari W/o Madhavrao Tidke and Madhavrao S/o Rambhau Tidke, seeking quashing of FIR No. MCase 3/2013 dated 05.02.2013 registered at Police Station, Ambad, District Jalna, and the consequent chargesheet and criminal proceedings in R.C.C. No. 117/2014 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ambad. The FIR was lodged by respondent no. 2, Chhaya W/o Sunil Waghmare, alleging offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Sections 3, 4, 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The dispute was essentially a matrimonial discord between the parties. During the pendency of the application, the parties arrived at an amicable settlement. The complainant, respondent no. 2, filed an affidavit stating that she had settled the matter with the applicants and did not wish to proceed with the criminal case. The court noted that the application of applicant nos. 1 to 3 had already been dismissed earlier. However, for applicant nos. 4 and 5, the court considered the settlement and the complainant's affidavit. The court observed that since the parties had settled the dispute and the complainant was no longer interested in prosecuting the case, continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. The court held that to secure the ends of justice, the FIR and the chargesheet against applicant nos. 4 and 5 deserved to be quashed. Accordingly, the court allowed the application for applicant nos. 4 and 5 and quashed the FIR and all proceedings in R.C.C. No. 117/2014 against them. Rule was made absolute in those terms.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Settlement between parties - Where the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the complainant is no longer interested in prosecuting the case, continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law - Held that the FIR and chargesheet can be quashed to secure the ends of justice (Paras 5-6).

B) Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4, 6 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 - Quashing of proceedings - Settlement - The dispute arose from a matrimonial discord and allegations of dowry demand and cruelty - After settlement, the complainant stated she does not want to proceed with the case - Held that no purpose would be served by continuing the trial (Paras 3-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and subsequent criminal proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC on the ground of settlement between the parties, where the complainant is no longer interested in prosecuting the case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application for applicant nos. 4 and 5 and quashed FIR No. MCase 3/2013 dated 05.02.2013 and all proceedings in R.C.C. No. 117/2014 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ambad, against them. Rule made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Section 482 CrPC
  • quashing of FIR
  • settlement between parties
  • abuse of process of law
  • Dowry Prohibition Act
  • 1961
  • Sections 3
  • 4
  • 6
  • Indian Penal Code
  • 1860
  • Sections 498-A
  • 323
  • 504
  • 506
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (07) 36

Criminal Application No. 3 of 2015

2015-07-24

S.S. Shinde, A. I. S. Cheema

Mr. Salunke Sudarshan J. for Applicants, Mr. Imale Ramesh R. for Respondent No.2, Mr. M.M. Nerlikar for Respondent/State

Godawari W/o Madhavrao Tidke and Madhavrao S/o Rambhau Tidke

The State of Maharashtra and Chhaya W/o Sunil Waghmare

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Applicants sought quashing of FIR No. MCase 3/2013 dated 05.02.2013, chargesheet, and proceedings in R.C.C. No. 117/2014.

Filing Reason

The FIR was filed by respondent no. 2 alleging offences under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties later settled the dispute amicably.

Previous Decisions

Application of applicant nos. 1 to 3 was already dismissed by this Court by order dated 22.06.2015.

Issues

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC on the ground of settlement between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

The parties have amicably settled the dispute. The complainant has filed an affidavit stating she does not wish to proceed with the case. Continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the complainant is no longer interested in prosecuting the case, continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, and the FIR and chargesheet can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC to secure the ends of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

This application has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying therein for quashing the F.I.R. No. MCase 3/2013 dated 05.02.2013 registered at Police Station, Ambad, chargesheet filed against the applicants on the basis of the said F.I.R. and also further proceedings in Criminal Case bearing R.C.C. No. 117/2014 pending against the applicants in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ambad. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the respondent no.2 has filed an affidavit stating that she does not want to proceed with the case. In such circumstances, no purpose would be served by continuing the trial. The continuation of the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

Procedural History

FIR No. MCase 3/2013 was registered on 05.02.2013. After investigation, chargesheet was filed and case registered as R.C.C. No. 117/2014 pending before JMFC, Ambad. Applicants filed Criminal Application No. 3 of 2015 under Section 482 CrPC for quashing. Application of applicant nos. 1 to 3 was dismissed on 22.06.2015. The present order deals with applicant nos. 4 and 5.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498-A, 323, 504, 506
  • Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961: 3, 4, 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Criminal Complaint Case — Remand for Compliance with Section 244 CrPC Set Aside. High Court erred in remanding matter for pre-charge evidence under Section 244 CrPC after charges were framed under Section 240 CrPC, as...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Dowry Prohibition Act Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Matrimonial Dispute Resolved Amicably, Complainant No Longer Wishes to Prosecute, Continuation of Proceedings Would Be Abuse of Process Under Se...