Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Approval for Appointment on Compassionate Grounds. Education Officer directed to grant approval to appointment of petitioner as Peon from date of her husband's death.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 26
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Chaya Baliram Bhore, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 24.11.2010 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad (respondent No.4), refusing to grant approval to her appointment as Peon in New High School Jamb (respondent No.3). The petitioner's husband, who was employed as a Peon in the same school since 1994, died in harness. After his death, the school management appointed the petitioner on compassionate grounds on 01.02.2010 on a clear, permanent, sanctioned, vacant post. The school forwarded the proposal for approval to the Education Officer, who rejected it on the ground that the appointment was not made in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 5.7.1999. The petitioner contended that her appointment was in compliance with the said resolution and that the Education Officer's refusal was arbitrary. The respondents argued that the appointment was not made as per the prescribed procedure. The Court examined the provisions of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, particularly Sections 5 and 7, and the Government Resolution dated 5.7.1999. The Court held that the petitioner's husband died in harness, and the appointment was made on a clear, permanent, sanctioned, vacant post. The Court found that the Education Officer's refusal was arbitrary and unsustainable. The Court allowed the petition, quashed the order dated 24.11.2010, and directed the Education Officer to grant approval to the petitioner's appointment w.e.f. 01.02.2010 and to pay her regular salary and arrears from that date.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Compassionate Appointment - Approval - The Education Officer refused approval to the appointment of the petitioner as Peon on compassionate grounds, citing that the appointment was not made in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 5.7.1999. The Court held that the petitioner's husband died in harness, and the appointment was made on a clear, permanent, sanctioned, vacant post. The Court directed the Education Officer to grant approval to the appointment w.e.f. 01.02.2010 and to pay regular salary and arrears. (Paras 1-10)

B) Service Law - Compassionate Appointment - Government Resolution - The Court interpreted the Government Resolution dated 5.7.1999 and held that the petitioner's appointment was in compliance with the said resolution. The Court noted that the petitioner was appointed on compassionate grounds after the death of her husband, who was a permanent employee of the school. (Paras 5-8)

C) Service Law - Approval of Appointment - Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - The Court held that the Education Officer has the power to grant approval to appointments made by private schools, and such approval cannot be refused arbitrarily. The Court found that the refusal in this case was arbitrary and unsustainable. (Paras 6-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Education Officer was justified in refusing to grant approval to the appointment of the petitioner on compassionate grounds, and whether the petitioner is entitled to salary from the date of her appointment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The order dated 24.11.2010 passed by respondent No.4 is quashed and set aside. Respondent No.4 is directed to grant approval to the petitioner's appointment as Peon w.e.f. 01.02.2010 and to pay her regular salary and arrears from that date.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • Approval of appointment
  • Education Officer's power
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act
  • 1977
  • Section 5
  • Section 7
  • Government Resolution dated 5.7.1999
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (04) 9

WRIT PETITION NO. 6823 OF 2014

2015-04-01

S.S. SHINDE, P.R. BORA

Mr.Dharurkar Chaitanya V. for petitioner; Mr. D.V. Tele, AGP for respondents No.1 & 4; Mr.R.V. Gore for respondents No.2 & 3

Chaya Baliram Bhore

The State of Maharashtra, School Education and Sports Department; Jai Jawan Jai Kisan Shikshan Sanstha; New High School Jamb; The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging refusal of approval for compassionate appointment

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 24.11.2010 refusing approval and direction to grant approval and pay salary

Filing Reason

Education Officer refused to grant approval to petitioner's appointment as Peon on compassionate grounds

Previous Decisions

Order dated 24.11.2010 by Education Officer refusing approval

Issues

Whether the Education Officer was justified in refusing to grant approval to the appointment of the petitioner on compassionate grounds? Whether the petitioner is entitled to salary from the date of her appointment?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Appointment was made on compassionate grounds after husband's death in harness, on a clear, permanent, sanctioned, vacant post, in compliance with Government Resolution dated 5.7.1999. Respondents: Appointment was not made in accordance with the prescribed procedure under the Government Resolution.

Ratio Decidendi

The Education Officer cannot arbitrarily refuse approval to a compassionate appointment made on a clear, permanent, sanctioned, vacant post, especially when the appointment is in compliance with the relevant Government Resolution. The refusal in this case was unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Counsel for the petitioner has tendered across the Bar a compilation of documents, which is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification purpose. The petitioner's husband was appointed as peon with the respondent No.3 school in the year, 1994. His appointment was on a clear, permanent, sanctioned, vacant post. The respondent No.4 by an order dated 4.7.1998 granted approval to the appointment of the petitioner's husband.

Procedural History

The petitioner's husband was appointed as Peon in 1994, approval granted on 4.7.1998. He died in harness. Petitioner appointed on compassionate grounds on 01.02.2010. Proposal sent to Education Officer who refused approval on 24.11.2010. Petitioner filed writ petition on 14.07.2014. Heard on 30.03.2015, judgment pronounced on 01.04.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977: 5, 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Approval for Appointment on Compassionate Grounds. Education Officer directed to grant approval to appointment of petitioner as Peon from date of her husband's death.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Due to Limitation Bar. Delay of 85 Days in Filing Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act Not Condoned for Lack of Sufficient Cause.