Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abortion Case Due to Medical Necessity and Marital Discord. FIR under Section 315 IPC quashed as abortion was medically necessary to save mother's life and complaint was filed after long delay due to marital discord.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 78
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, including the wife (applicant no.1) and her relatives, sought quashing of FIR No. 201/2014 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Akola for offences under Section 315 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR was lodged by the husband (non-applicant no.2) alleging that the applicants caused miscarriage of the wife. The court noted that the alleged abortion occurred on 18.02.2012, but the FIR was lodged only on 01.12.2013, and proceedings under Section 156(3) CrPC were initiated on 09.05.2014, indicating a delay of over two years. The statement of Dr. Archana Nitin Agrawal revealed that the wife was carrying a dead foetus and abortion was advised to save her life. The court observed that the wife and husband were not on good terms, and the complaint was filed in the backdrop of marital discord. The court held that continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process of law and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Abuse of Process - FIR under Section 315 IPC quashed where abortion was medically necessary to save mother's life and complaint was filed after 22 months due to marital discord - Held that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR alleging offence under Section 315 IPC for abortion should be quashed when the abortion was medically necessary to save the mother's life and the complaint was filed after a long delay due to marital discord.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application, quashed FIR No. 201/2014 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Akola and all consequential proceedings.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Section 315 IPC
  • Medical Termination of Pregnancy
  • Marital Discord
  • Delay in FIR
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (03) 156

Criminal Application (APL) No.590/2014

2015-03-11

A. B. Chaudhari, P. N. Deshmukh

Mr. A. V. Band for applicants, Mr. V. A. Thakare for non applicant no.1 State, Mr. R. R. Vyas for non applicant no.2

Swati Sunil Nimbolkar and others

State of Maharashtra and Sunil Nilkanthrao Nimbalkar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 201/2014 and all consequential proceedings

Filing Reason

Applicants alleged that the FIR was false and filed due to marital discord, and the abortion was medically necessary to save the mother's life

Issues

Whether the FIR under Section 315 IPC should be quashed when the abortion was medically necessary and the complaint was filed after a long delay due to marital discord.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that the abortion was medically necessary as the foetus was dead, and the FIR was filed after a long delay due to marital discord. Non-applicant no.2 argued that the applicants caused miscarriage and committed an offence under Section 315 IPC, and investigation should not be quashed.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the abortion was medically necessary to save the mother's life and the complaint was filed after a long delay in the backdrop of marital discord, continuing prosecution would be an abuse of process of law, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The statement of Dr. Archana Nitin Agrawal from Akola which clearly shows that applicant no.1 was carrying a dead foetus and, therefore, was advised to remove the same in order to save her life and accordingly abortion was done. In the backdrop of the above facts, we are of the opinion that the continuation of the prosecution would be an abuse of process of law.

Procedural History

FIR No. 201/2014 was registered on 01.12.2013 at Police Station Civil Lines, Akola for offences under Section 315 read with Section 34 IPC. Proceedings under Section 156(3) CrPC were initiated on 09.05.2014. The applicants filed Criminal Application (APL) No.590/2014 under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 315, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482, 156(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Interpretation of Ship Recycling Plot Reservation. The Court Held That Reservation Under Regulation 5.4 of the Gujarat Maritime Board (Conditions & Procedures for granting permission for Utilizing Ship...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abortion Case Due to Medical Necessity and Marital Discord. FIR under Section 315 IPC quashed as abortion was medically necessary to save mother's life and complaint was filed after long delay due to marital discord.