Bombay High Court Allows Reduction of Share Capital of Starwood Capital India Advisors Private Limited Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956 — Procedure Under Section 101(2) Dispensed With Due to Absence of Creditors. The court held that where a company has no secured, unsecured or trade creditors, the requirement of obtaining creditor consent under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 is not necessary.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 110
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Starwood Capital India Advisors Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a Company Summons for Direction No. 388 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court seeking approval for reduction of its share capital under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956. The company had passed a special resolution in an Extraordinary General Meeting held on 11 February 2014, approving the reduction of its issued and paid-up equity share capital from Rs. 1,71,30,000 (divided into 17,13,000 equity shares of Rs. 10 each) to Rs. 1,00,000 (consisting of 10,000 equity shares of Rs. 10 each). The reduction was to be effected by paying off an aggregate sum not exceeding Rs. 91,11,050 (Rs. 5.35 per share) proportionately to the holders of 17,03,000 equity shares. The company, through its director Mr. Sundaram Rajagopal, filed an affidavit stating that the company had no secured, unsecured or trade creditors. The court, after hearing the applicant's advocate Ms. Saeeda Bandukwala, noted that in view of the absence of any creditors, the procedure prescribed under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, which requires consent of creditors or compliance with certain formalities, was dispensed with. The court allowed the reduction of share capital as proposed.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Reduction of Share Capital - Sections 100-104 Companies Act, 1956 - Dispensation of Creditor Procedure - The applicant company sought reduction of its issued and paid-up equity share capital from Rs. 1,71,30,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 by paying off shareholders holding 17,03,000 shares. The company had no secured, unsecured or trade creditors. The court dispensed with the procedure under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, which requires consent of creditors, as there were no creditors to be affected. Held that where a company has no creditors, the requirement of obtaining creditor consent or following the procedure under Section 101(2) is not necessary (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the procedure under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 requiring consent of creditors can be dispensed with when the company has no secured, unsecured or trade creditors.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the reduction of share capital as proposed and dispensed with the procedure under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 in view of the absence of any creditors.

Law Points

  • Reduction of share capital
  • Special resolution
  • Dispensation of creditor consent
  • Section 101(2) Companies Act 1956
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (05) 33

Company Summons for Direction No. 388 of 2014

2014-05-09

G. S. Patel

Ms. Saeeda Bandukwala instructed by J. Sagar Associates

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company application for reduction of share capital under Sections 100-104 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Remedy Sought

The applicant company sought court approval for reduction of its issued and paid-up equity share capital and dispensation of the procedure under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Filing Reason

The company wanted to reduce its share capital as it was in excess of requirements, by paying off shareholders proportionately.

Previous Decisions

The company passed a special resolution in an Extraordinary General Meeting on 11 February 2014 approving the reduction.

Issues

Whether the procedure under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 requiring consent of creditors can be dispensed with when the company has no secured, unsecured or trade creditors.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant company, through its director's affidavit, stated that it had no secured, unsecured or trade creditors, and therefore the procedure under Section 101(2) should be dispensed with.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a company has no secured, unsecured or trade creditors, the procedure under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 requiring consent of creditors or compliance with formalities is not necessary and can be dispensed with.

Judgment Excerpts

In view of the above, the procedure prescribed under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 is dispensed with.

Procedural History

The applicant company filed a Company Summons for Direction on 20 March 2014. The court heard the applicant on 9 May 2014 and passed the order allowing the reduction and dispensing with the procedure under Section 101(2).

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 1956: 100, 101, 102, 103, 104
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Reduction of Share Capital of Starwood Capital India Advisors Private Limited Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956 — Procedure Under Section 101(2) Dispensed With Due to Absence of Creditors. The court held that wh...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Licensee's Enhancement of Electricity Rates Under Electricity Supply Act, 1948 — Amendment Permits Unilateral Rate Adjustment to Maintain Reasonable Profit. Licensee's Power to Enhance Rates under Amended Schedule VI Upheld; No...