Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Assault in Matricide Case — Appellant Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Killing His Mother with a Sword Stick. The Court Held That the Testimony of the Sole Eyewitness Was Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR, and That the Offence of Murder Under Section 302 IPC Was Made Out.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Ravindra Sahebrao Babre, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of his mother, Kusum Babre, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and for causing simple hurt to his brother, Nandkishor, under Section 323 IPC. The incident occurred on 26 July 2013, when the appellant, under the influence of alcohol and after a quarrel, assaulted his brother and then chased and fatally stabbed his mother with a sword stick. The deceased was declared brought dead at the hospital. The sole eyewitness, Nandkishor, lodged a prompt FIR. The medical officer confirmed the cause of death as a stab injury to the left kidney. The appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence, including the testimony of Nandkishor, the medical evidence, and the promptness of the FIR. The court found the eyewitness account credible and corroborated, and held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court also noted the motive of the appellant demanding money for liquor and his history of quarrels. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Sole Eyewitness Testimony - The appellant was convicted for murdering his mother by assaulting her with a sword stick. The sole eyewitness was the deceased's other son, whose testimony was found credible, corroborated by medical evidence and prompt FIR. The court held that the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt and the conviction was proper. (Paras 1-15)

B) Criminal Law - Assault - Section 323 IPC - The appellant also assaulted his brother, causing simple injuries. The conviction under Section 323 IPC was upheld as the medical evidence supported the injuries. (Paras 2-10)

C) Evidence Law - Credibility of Witness - The court held that the testimony of the sole eyewitness, being natural and consistent, was sufficient to convict, especially when corroborated by medical evidence and prompt lodging of FIR. (Paras 8-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code is sustainable based on the evidence of the sole eyewitness and other circumstances.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence passed by the Sessions Court are upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 323 IPC
  • Sole eyewitness testimony
  • Credibility of witness
  • Prompt FIR
  • Medical evidence corroboration
  • Motive
  • Intention to cause death
  • Life imprisonment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (10) 125

Criminal Appeal No. 77 of 2017

2017-10-31

R. K. Deshpande, M. G. Giratkar

Shri R. M. Daga for the appellant, Shri V. P. Gangane, Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent

Ravindra s/o Sahebrao Babre

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and assault.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction under Sections 302 and 323 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the Sessions Court for murdering his mother and assaulting his brother.

Previous Decisions

Sessions Court convicted the appellant under Sections 302 and 323 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment and fine.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of the sole eyewitness? Whether the conviction under Section 323 IPC is sustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence of the sole eyewitness was not credible and that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Respondent argued that the eyewitness testimony was corroborated by medical evidence and prompt FIR, and the conviction was proper.

Ratio Decidendi

The testimony of the sole eyewitness, being natural, consistent, and corroborated by medical evidence and prompt FIR, is sufficient to sustain a conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC. The court held that the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

The case of the prosecution in short is as under : Appellant was chargesheeted by Police Station, Talegaon (Sh.), District Wardha for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. Deceased Kusum Babre was the mother of appellant and P.W. 1 Nandkishor. On 2672013, in the morning, appellant started quarrel with his brother Nandkishor... Appellant kicked on the door and entered into the house of Nandkishor. He brought one sword stick from his house. Thereafter appellant chased his mother. In the lane, accused/appellant assaulted deceased mother by sword stick and thereafter ran away. Medical Officer declared her brought dead. As per his opinion, cause of death was due to stab injury over left kidney.

Procedural History

The appellant was chargesheeted by the police for offences under Sections 302 and 323 IPC. The Sessions Court convicted him and sentenced him to life imprisonment. The appellant filed an appeal before the High Court against the conviction and sentence.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code: 302, 323
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Assault in Matricide Case — Appellant Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Killing His Mother with a Sword Stick. The Court Held That the Testimony of the Sole Eyewitness Was Credible and Corroborat...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Declaration That Gond Gowari Tribe Is Extinct, Reaffirms Parliamentary Power Over Scheduled Tribes List. The Court Held That Only Parliament Can Amend the Scheduled Tribes List Under Article 342(2) of the Constituti...