Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Complaint in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Costs Imposed as Condition Precedent. Applicant permitted to withdraw criminal complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 subject to payment of costs directed earlier.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 57
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a criminal application filed by Smt. Sumedha w/o Sunil Chitpur @ Sumedha d/o Vithalrao Shinde, an advocate by profession, seeking withdrawal of a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complaint, S.T.C. No.2256 of 2009, was pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court No.6 at Latur, against the respondent Krishnakumar s/o Baburao Kulkarni. The applicant's counsel submitted that the matter was under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and that the applicant wished to withdraw the complaint. The respondent's counsel accepted that costs, as directed by the Court on the last occasion, had been received. The Court, after hearing both sides, allowed the application and permitted the withdrawal of the complaint. The Court also directed that the complaint be treated as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. The judgment was delivered by Justice A.I.S. Cheema on 11th April 2014.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Withdrawal of Complaint - Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Costs - The applicant sought withdrawal of a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court No.6 at Latur. The respondent accepted costs as directed by the Court on the last occasion. The Court allowed the withdrawal, noting that costs had been received. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant should be permitted to withdraw the criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and whether the costs directed earlier have been received.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the application and permitted the applicant to withdraw the complaint. The complaint S.T.C. No.2256 of 2009 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court No.6 at Latur shall stand withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
  • 1881
  • Costs as condition precedent
  • Acceptance of costs by respondent
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (04) 26

Criminal Application No.6614 of 2013

2014-04-11

A.I.S. Cheema

Shri S.S. Thombre for Applicant, Shri R.P. Adgaonkar for Respondent

Smt. Sumedha w/o Sunil Chitpur @ Sumedha d/o Vithalrao Shinde

Krishnakumar s/o Baburao Kulkarni

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for withdrawal of complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought permission to withdraw the criminal complaint S.T.C. No.2256 of 2009 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court No.6 at Latur.

Filing Reason

Applicant wished to withdraw the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Previous Decisions

Court had earlier directed payment of costs, which were accepted by the respondent.

Issues

Whether the applicant should be permitted to withdraw the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel submitted that the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is pending and applicant wants to withdraw it. Respondent's counsel accepted that costs as directed by the Court on the last occasion have been received.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court permitted withdrawal of the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the respondent had accepted the costs directed earlier, indicating no objection to the withdrawal.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for Respondent accepted that costs, as directed by this Court on the last occasion, has been received. The application is allowed. The applicant is permitted to withdraw the complaint.

Procedural History

The criminal application was filed in 2013. On the last occasion, the Court directed payment of costs. On 11th April 2014, the Court heard both sides and allowed the withdrawal.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Applicant in Negotiable Instruments Act Case, Holding Change of Magistrate Does Not Automatically Require De Novo Trial in Summary Cases Tried as Summons Cases. The Court Followed Precedents That Distinguish Between Summary a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Complaint in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Costs Imposed as Condition Precedent. Applicant permitted to withdraw criminal complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 subject to payment ...