Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Carpenter's Income Assessed at Rs. 2,500 per Month with Multiplier of 18. Loss of Dependency Calculated at Rs. 3,60,000 with Additional Awards for Consortium and Funeral Expenses.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, the widow and minor daughter of the deceased Ambardas Bhoyar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for the death of Ambardas in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 12.2.1992. The deceased was traveling in a jeep (registration No. MUK 7979) which dashed against a stationary truck (registration No. WB231458) parked on the road. The jeep was insured with respondent No.1 (National Insurance Co. Ltd.) and owned and driven by respondent No.2. The truck was owned by respondent No.4 and insured with respondent No.5 (New India Insurance Co. Ltd.), while respondent No.3 was its driver. The appellants alleged rashness and negligence on the part of both drivers. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, by its judgment and award dated 27.8.1999 in Claim Petition No.177 of 1992, awarded a total compensation of Rs. 1,05,000 with interest at 9% per annum from the date of petition. Aggrieved by the quantum, the appellants filed the present appeal seeking enhancement. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the Tribunal had erred in assessing the deceased's income at Rs. 1,500 per month. The deceased was a carpenter aged 25 years, and considering the minimum wages and future prospects, the court assessed his income at Rs. 2,500 per month. Applying the multiplier of 18 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121, and deducting 1/3rd for personal expenses, the loss of dependency was calculated as Rs. 2,500 x 12 x 18 x 2/3 = Rs. 3,60,000. The court also enhanced the amounts for loss of consortium from Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 10,000 and for funeral expenses from Rs. 2,000 to Rs. 5,000. The total compensation was thus enhanced to Rs. 3,75,000, with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition. The appeal was allowed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Enhancement - Income Assessment - The Tribunal assessed the deceased's income at Rs. 1,500 per month based on the evidence of the appellant, but the High Court found that the deceased, being a skilled carpenter, would have earned at least Rs. 2,500 per month, considering the minimum wages and future prospects - Held that the income should be taken as Rs. 2,500 per month (Paras 5-6).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Multiplier - The Tribunal applied a multiplier of 12, but the High Court, following the principles in Sarla Verma v. DTC, applied a multiplier of 18 as the deceased was 25 years old - Held that the multiplier should be 18 (Para 7).

C) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Deduction for Personal Expenses - The Tribunal deducted 1/3rd for personal expenses, but the High Court, noting that the deceased had a wife and a minor daughter, held that 1/3rd deduction was correct - No interference (Para 8).

D) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Loss of Consortium - The Tribunal awarded Rs. 5,000 for loss of consortium, but the High Court enhanced it to Rs. 10,000 following the principles in Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh - Held that the amount should be Rs. 10,000 (Para 9).

E) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Funeral Expenses - The Tribunal awarded Rs. 2,000 for funeral expenses, but the High Court enhanced it to Rs. 5,000 - Held that the amount should be Rs. 5,000 (Para 10).

F) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Interest - The Tribunal awarded interest at 9% per annum from the date of petition, but the High Court maintained the rate but directed that interest be paid from the date of filing of the petition - No interference (Para 11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal was just and proper, and whether the Tribunal erred in assessing the income of the deceased and applying the correct multiplier.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced from Rs. 1,05,000 to Rs. 3,75,000. The enhanced amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization. The respondents are directed to pay the enhanced amount within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Compensation Enhancement
  • Negligence
  • Contributory Negligence
  • Multiplier
  • Income Calculation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (02) 194

First Appeal No.449 of 1999

2014-02-27

S.B. Shukre, J.

Mr. Rohan Chhabra for the Appellants; None for the Respondents

Smt. Sujata wd/o. Ambardas Bhoyar and Ku. Shruti d/o. Ambardas Bhoyar

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Shri Ramesh P. Shukla, Shri Balbirsingh, Shri Rajakumar, New India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, in a claim petition for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal for the death of the husband and father of the appellants in a motor vehicle accident.

Filing Reason

The appellants were dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, which they considered inadequate.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, by its judgment and award dated 27.8.1999 in Claim Petition No.177 of 1992, awarded Rs. 1,05,000 with interest at 9% per annum from the date of petition.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in assessing the income of the deceased at Rs. 1,500 per month? Whether the multiplier of 12 applied by the Tribunal was correct? Whether the amounts awarded under the heads of loss of consortium and funeral expenses were inadequate?

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the deceased was a skilled carpenter aged 25 years and would have earned at least Rs. 2,500 per month, and the Tribunal's assessment of income at Rs. 1,500 was too low. The appellants contended that the multiplier should be 18 as per the principles in Sarla Verma v. DTC, and not 12 as applied by the Tribunal. The appellants submitted that the amounts awarded for loss of consortium (Rs. 5,000) and funeral expenses (Rs. 2,000) were inadequate and should be enhanced.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the income of the deceased should be assessed at Rs. 2,500 per month considering his skill as a carpenter and future prospects. The multiplier of 18 was applied as per Sarla Verma v. DTC. The amounts for loss of consortium and funeral expenses were enhanced to Rs. 10,000 and Rs. 5,000 respectively, following Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh.

Judgment Excerpts

Being aggrieved by the judgment and award passed on 27th August, 1999 in Claim Petition No.177 of 1992 by the Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, that the present appeal has been preferred by the appellants. In an accident, which occurred at about 1.00 p.m. on 12.2.1992 husband of appellant No.1 and father of appellant No.2 died on spot when Jeep bearing registration No.MUK 7979 by which he was travelling dashed against a stationary truck parked on the road, which had registration No.WB231458. The Tribunal assessed the income of the deceased at Rs. 1,500 per month. However, considering the fact that the deceased was a carpenter and would have earned at least Rs. 2,500 per month, this court assesses his income at Rs. 2,500 per month. Applying the multiplier of 18 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, the loss of dependency is calculated as Rs. 2,500 x 12 x 18 x 2/3 = Rs. 3,60,000. The amount for loss of consortium is enhanced from Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 10,000 and for funeral expenses from Rs. 2,000 to Rs. 5,000.

Procedural History

The appellants filed Claim Petition No.177 of 1992 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for the death of Ambardas Bhoyar in a motor vehicle accident. The Tribunal passed an award on 27.8.1999 granting Rs. 1,05,000 with interest. Aggrieved, the appellants filed the present First Appeal No.449 of 1999 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was heard and disposed of on 27.2.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Carpenter's Income Assessed at Rs. 2,500 per Month with Multiplier of 18. Loss of Dependency Calculated at Rs. 3,60,000 with Additional Awards for Consorti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Petition in Unauthorized Subletting Case Under Bombay Rent Act. Unauthorized Transfer of Leasehold Property to Municipal Corporation Without Consent Constitutes Ground for Eviction Under Section 13(1)(e) o...