Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Market Committee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Market Committee"

157 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 157 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Confectionery and Food Drinks Under APMC Act. Confectionery and Food Drinks Are Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, and Hence Not Subject to Market Fee.

18 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Cadbury India Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, manufactures confectionery and food drinks at its ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

3 Aug 2017

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Elections to Market Committee Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Notification Requirement. Court holds that elections cannot be ordered until State Government issues notification under Section 13(1B) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963, specifying number of members and reserved categories.

19 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Shekhar Ramchandra Badade, claiming to be an agriculturist and member of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Neera, filed a wri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Market Committee in Market Fee Dispute: Processed Agricultural Produce Imported from Outside State is Liable for Market Fee Under Karnataka APMC Act. The Court held that the Explanation to Section 65(2) of the Karnataka APMC Act excludes the exemption for imported agricultural produce, and the importer is liable to pay market fee under Section 65(2-A)(ia).

14 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by APMC Yashwanthapura against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had held that the respondent,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jul 2016

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Inclusion of Dry Fruits Under APMC Act — Notifications Ultra Vires. Definition of Agricultural Produce Under Section 2(a) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 is Exhaustive and Does Not Include Dry Fruits/Dry Dates.

17 Jun 2005

The petitioner, a partnership firm dealing in dry fruits and dry dates, challenged the validity of notifications dated 20.6.1988 and 18.10.1988 issued...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Grampanchayats to Participate in APMC Elections as Nominees of Local Authorities Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Grampanchayat Held to Be a Local Authority Entitled to Nominate Members to APMC Under Section 11 of the Act.

29 Sep 2015

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats (village councils) in Maharashtra challenging the rejection of their nomination form...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Agricultural Marketing Act Case — Processed Goods Not Covered. Notification Adding Sugar, Dry Fruits, and Edible Oils to Schedule Under Section 62 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Ultra Vires.

16 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Britannia Industries Limited, a public company with its registered office in Calcutta and a branch in Bombay, filed a writ petition un...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)