Supreme Court Allows APSRTC Appeals in Employee Repatriation Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 — Section 82 Governs Corporation Employees, Not Section 77. The Court upheld repatriation orders of Class III and IV employees to their parent zones in Telangana, holding that guidelines jointly formulated by corporations are binding and Section 77 does not apply.

  • 726
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves appeals by the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) against a common judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that dismissed writ appeals and upheld an order quashing repatriation orders of certain employees. The respondents were Class III and IV employees (conductors, drivers, shramiks) appointed between 2014 and 2017 in zones that became part of Telangana after the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh under the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014. They were temporarily deputed to zones in Andhra Pradesh. After the bifurcation of the corporations, APSRTC issued repatriation orders on 08.06.2017 directing them to return to their parent zones in Telangana. The respondents challenged these orders in writ petitions, which were allowed by a single judge on 10.11.2017 on the ground that guidelines for allocation of employees had not been finalized. APSRTC filed writ appeals, and during the pendency, the corporations jointly formulated guidelines (Agenda Note dated 16.08.2017) stating that Class III and IV employees are recruited at regional level and belong to the corporation where the region falls, so no allocation was needed. The division bench initially passed an interim order on 18.04.2018 suspending the single judge's order and directing respondents to report to their parent zones. However, in the final impugned order, the High Court took a different view, drawing an analogy with Section 77 of the Act (applicable to state government employees) and directed permanent allocation of respondents in their deputational posts in Andhra Pradesh, also ruling on seniority. The Supreme Court considered the issue of whether Section 77 or Section 82 of the Act applies to employees of public sector undertakings. The Court examined the provisions and held that Section 82 specifically governs employees of corporations like APSRTC, while Section 77 applies to state government employees. The Court noted that the guidelines jointly formulated by the corporations (Agenda Note) clearly provided that Class III and IV employees are recruited at regional level and belong to the corporation where the region falls, and thus no allocation was required. The Court found that the High Court erred in applying Section 77 by analogy. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order of the High Court, and upheld the repatriation orders. The Court directed that the respondents shall continue to serve in their parent zones under TSRTC as per the interim order dated 18.04.2018.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - State Reorganisation - Allocation of Employees - Section 82 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 - The issue was whether employees of a public sector undertaking (APSRTC) should be allocated under Section 77 (applicable to state government employees) or Section 82 (applicable to employees of public sector undertakings). The Supreme Court held that Section 82 governs the allocation of employees of corporations, and the High Court erred in drawing an analogy with Section 77. (Paras 9-11)

B) Service Law - Repatriation - Zonal Cadre Employees - Section 82 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 - Class III and IV employees recruited at regional level belong to the corporation in which the region falls after bifurcation. The guidelines jointly formulated by APSRTC and TSRTC (Agenda Note dated 16.08.2017) provided that such employees are not required to be allocated between the two corporations, and repatriation to parent zones was valid. (Paras 3-4, 8, 11)

C) Service Law - Permanent Allocation - Deemed Allocation - Section 77(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 - The High Court's direction for permanent allocation of respondents in their deputational posts based on the third proviso to Section 77(2) was incorrect as Section 77 does not apply to corporation employees. The Supreme Court set aside the impugned order and upheld the repatriation orders. (Paras 7, 11)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court correctly applied Section 77 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 to employees of a public sector undertaking, and whether Section 82 governs the allocation of such employees

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order of the High Court dated 21.11.2019, and upheld the repatriation orders dated 08.06.2017. The respondents shall continue to serve in their parent zones under TSRTC as per the interim order dated 18.04.2018.

Law Points

  • Section 82 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act
  • 2014 governs allocation of employees of public sector undertakings
  • not Section 77 which applies to state government employees
  • Class III and IV employees of corporations are recruited at regional level and belong to the corporation where the region falls after bifurcation
  • guidelines jointly formulated by corporations for allocation are binding and final
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (SC) (9) 64

Civil Appeal No. 5267 of 2024 with connected appeals

2024-09-03

Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

2024 INSC 663

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

V.V. Brahma Reddy & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeals against High Court judgment dismissing writ appeals and upholding order quashing repatriation orders of employees of a state road transport corporation after state bifurcation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant APSRTC sought to set aside the High Court's order directing permanent allocation of respondents in their deputational posts in Andhra Pradesh and to uphold the repatriation orders.

Filing Reason

The High Court erroneously applied Section 77 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 to employees of a public sector undertaking, instead of Section 82, and directed permanent allocation contrary to the jointly formulated guidelines.

Previous Decisions

Single Judge of High Court allowed writ petitions quashing repatriation orders on 10.11.2017. Division Bench initially passed interim order on 18.04.2018 suspending single judge's order, but later passed final order on 21.11.2019 allowing writ appeals and directing permanent allocation.

Issues

Whether the High Court correctly applied Section 77 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 to employees of a public sector undertaking (APSRTC) instead of Section 82. Whether the guidelines jointly formulated by APSRTC and TSRTC (Agenda Note dated 16.08.2017) validly determined the allocation of Class III and IV employees, making repatriation orders valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (APSRTC): Section 82 governs allocation of employees of public sector undertakings, not Section 77. The Agenda Note dated 16.08.2017 provides that Class III and IV employees are recruited at regional level and belong to the corporation where the region falls, so no allocation is needed. The decision is final and unchallenged. Respondents: The High Court correctly applied Section 77 by analogy. The Agenda Note only deals with state-cadre employees, not Class III and IV employees, so modalities for allocation under Section 82 have not been decided.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 82 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 governs the allocation of employees of public sector undertakings, not Section 77 which applies to state government employees. The guidelines jointly formulated by the corporations (Agenda Note dated 16.08.2017) are binding and provide that Class III and IV employees are recruited at regional level and belong to the corporation where the region falls, making repatriation to parent zones valid.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue before us is whether the High Court's reliance on Section 77 is correct as it applies to state government employees, and whether it is Section 82 that governs the services of the respondents as it relates to employees of Public Sector Undertakings. Examination of the scope and ambit of these provisions sufficiently indicates the correct answer to the question arising for consideration.

Procedural History

Respondents filed writ petitions challenging repatriation orders dated 08.06.2017. Single Judge allowed writ petitions on 10.11.2017. Appellant filed writ appeals. Division Bench passed interim order on 18.04.2018 suspending single judge's order. Final order on 21.11.2019 allowed writ appeals and directed permanent allocation. Appellant filed civil appeals before Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014: Section 3, Section 4, Section 77, Section 82
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Anticipatory Bail in Rape Case Involving Casting Couch Allegations Due to Overlooked Victim Credibility and Gravity of Offence. High Court's Grant of Bail Under Section 438 CrPC Set Aside as Court Emphasized Seriousness of Secti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Order in Coastal Zone Case for Violation of Natural Justice. Respondent Authority Relied on Material Not Disclosed to Petitioner, Rendering Order Unsustainable.