Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 24
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Saleem Abdul Majid Bagwan, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur on 30th July 1994 for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs.5,000/- with default imprisonment of one year. The case arose from an incident on 14th September 1992 where the injured, Vinayak Kuberappa Budharam, was stabbed in the abdomen. The medical officer, Dr. Udhav Borade (PW 9), examined the injured and noted two incised wounds: one over the left hypochondrium (5 x 3 cm x muscle deep) and another over the posterior left arm (6 x 3 cm muscle deep). The injuries were described as dangerous to life. The appellant challenged his conviction before the Bombay High Court. The court heard both sides and perused the record. The court found that the evidence of eyewitnesses was inconsistent and that the injured himself did not name the appellant in the first information report. The identification of the appellant as the assailant was doubtful. The court held that the prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence, and acquitted the appellant.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Identification of Accused - The appellant was convicted for stabbing the injured with a knife. The court examined the evidence of eyewitnesses and found inconsistencies regarding the identity of the assailant and the manner of assault. The injured himself did not name the appellant in the first information report. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt and acquitted the appellant. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for stabbing the injured is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellant acquitted.

Law Points

  • Section 307 IPC
  • Attempt to murder
  • Identification of accused
  • Benefit of doubt
  • Inconsistent evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (10) 72

Criminal Appeal No. 433 of 1994

2013-10-11

A. H. Joshi

Mr. U.R. Agondsurve for the appellant, Ms. A.A. Mane, APP for the respondent

Saleem Abdul Majid Bagwan

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for attempt to murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal by setting aside conviction and sentence under Section 307 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for stabbing the injured Vinayak Kuberappa Budharam

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellant on 30th July 1994 in Sessions Case No. 155 of 1993

Issues

Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant stabbed the injured with intent to murder. Whether the identification of the appellant as the assailant was reliable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was inconsistent and identification was doubtful. Respondent/State supported the conviction.

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in evidence and doubtful identification.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard both sides. Perused the record. The Appellant was tried in Sessions Case No. 155 of 1993 by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur on 30th July, 1994. He is convicted for the offence punishable u/sec. 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer Rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default R.I. for one year. Injured was Vinayak assaulted by the accused by stabbing at the abdomen. The injuries suffered by Vinayak are described as dangerous to the life.

Procedural History

The appellant was tried in Sessions Case No. 155 of 1993 before the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, convicted on 30th July 1994 under Section 307 IPC, and sentenced to five years RI and fine. He appealed to the Bombay High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 433 of 1994, which was heard and decided on 11th October 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 307
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court Order Set Aside. Compensation Non-Payment Does Not Automatically Trigger Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition...