Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declarations in Bride Burning Case. Two consistent dying declarations naming the appellant as the perpetrator were found reliable and sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 20
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Shekhar @ Shankar Hanmant Hosmani, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Shobha, a sex worker, by pouring kerosene on her and setting her on fire. The incident occurred on June 19, 2003, following a quarrel over a demand of Rs. 2,000. The deceased sustained burn injuries and died on June 26, 2003 due to septicemia. The prosecution relied on two dying declarations recorded by PW9 Police Constable Shinde (Exhibit 24) and PW6 Sitaram Nikam (Exhibit 26), both of which consistently stated that the appellant demanded money and set her on fire. The trial court convicted the appellant, and the High Court upheld the conviction, finding the dying declarations reliable and sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on two dying declarations - The appellant was convicted for murder by burning the deceased after a quarrel over money. The court held that the two dying declarations (Exhibits 24 and 26) were consistent, reliable, and sufficient to sustain the conviction. The court found no reason to disbelieve the dying declarations and upheld the life sentence. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC based on two dying declarations is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction under Section 302 IPC and sentence of life imprisonment with fine of Rs.1000 upheld.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • reliability of dying declaration
  • conviction based on dying declaration
  • Section 302 IPC
  • murder by burning
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (07) 90

Criminal Appeal No.381 of 2009

2013-07-10

MRS.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR

Mr.Murtaza M. Najmi, Ms.S.V. Sonawane

Shekhar @ Shankar Hanmant Hosmani

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder based on dying declarations

Previous Decisions

Sessions Judge, Satara convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC on 30.3.2005 in Sessions Case No.22 of 2004

Issues

Whether the dying declarations are reliable and sufficient to sustain conviction

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declarations were not reliable State argued that the dying declarations were consistent and credible

Ratio Decidendi

Two consistent dying declarations recorded by independent witnesses are sufficient to base conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, as they are reliable and inspire confidence.

Judgment Excerpts

After carefully considering the same, we are of opinion that the appellant poured kerosene on Shobha and set her on fire. The conviction of the appellant is based on the two dying declarations (exhibits 24 and 26).

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Satara on 30.3.2005 in Sessions Case No.22 of 2004 under Section 302 IPC. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay, which heard the appeal and dismissed it on 10.7.2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declarations in Bride Burning Case. Two consistent dying declarations naming the appellant as the perpetrator were found reliable and sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IP...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds CAT Order Directing Appointment of Candidates Who Suppressed Criminal Cases in Application Form — Suppression of Criminal Case Not Material When Case Ended in Acquittal and Candidates Were Otherwise Eligible.