Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Occupier in Company Liquidation - Licence Created After Winding Up Petition is Void. Official Liquidator Entitled to Recover Possession from Trespasser Despite Deemed Tenancy Decree.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 83
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in a company application filed by Respondent No.3 (original applicant) against the Official Liquidator of M/s.Modella Textiles Industries Private Limited (Respondent No.1) and M/s.Modella Woollens Ltd. (Appellant). The company application sought declarations that the appellant, in occupation of office premises No.4-C on the 4th floor of Vulcan Insurance Building, Mumbai, was a trespasser with no legal right to occupy, and that a licence purportedly created by the company in liquidation was illegal, fraudulent, and void ab initio. Further, a decree passed by the Court of Small Causes, Mumbai in RAD Suit No.5937 of 1986, which held the appellant to be a deemed tenant, was sought to be declared a nullity and set aside. The Single Judge made the application absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), and (c), directing the Official Liquidator to make a report within eight weeks. The appellant appealed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent. The court considered whether the licence created after the winding up petition was valid and whether the deemed tenancy decree was binding. The court held that the licence was void ab initio as it was created after the winding up petition, and the decree was a nullity. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Single Judge's order.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Winding Up - Void Licence - A licence created by a company after the filing of a winding up petition is void ab initio and does not confer any rights on the licensee. The Official Liquidator is entitled to recover possession from such a licensee who is a trespasser. (Paras 1-3)

B) Property Law - Deemed Tenancy - Nullity Decree - A decree of deemed tenancy obtained by a licensee after the winding up petition is a nullity and not binding on the Official Liquidator. The court can set aside such a decree in company proceedings. (Paras 3-5)

C) Civil Procedure - Letters Patent Appeal - Clause 15 - An appeal lies against an order of a Single Judge in company matters under clause 15 of the Letters Patent. The appellate court can examine the validity of the order. (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a licence created by a company after the filing of a winding up petition is valid and whether a decree of deemed tenancy obtained by the licensee is binding on the Official Liquidator.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Order of Single Judge dated 13th April 1995 upheld.

Law Points

  • Winding up petition
  • relation back doctrine
  • void licence
  • trespasser
  • deemed tenant
  • nullity decree
  • company liquidation
  • possession recovery
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (09) 38

APPEAL NO.519 OF 1995 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO.482 OF 1993 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.404 OF 1986

2005-09-29

DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, S.C.DHARMADHIKARI

Mr.D.D.Madon, Sr.Counsel i/by M/s.Malvi Ranchoddas & Co. for appellant; Mrs.Chitra Phadke for respondent no.3; Mr.P.G.Rao, Deputy Official Liquidator

M/s.Modella Woollens Ltd.

The Official Liquidator & others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of Single Judge in company application seeking declaration of trespass and nullity of licence and decree.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the Single Judge's order making the company application absolute.

Filing Reason

Appellant claimed right to occupy premises under a licence and deemed tenancy decree, which the Official Liquidator and respondent no.3 challenged as void.

Previous Decisions

Single Judge made company application absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), and (c) on 13th April 1995.

Issues

Whether the licence created by the company in liquidation after the filing of the winding up petition is valid. Whether the decree of deemed tenancy obtained by the appellant is binding on the Official Liquidator.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the licence and deemed tenancy decree were valid and conferred rights. Respondent no.3 and Official Liquidator argued that the licence was void ab initio and the decree was a nullity.

Ratio Decidendi

A licence created by a company after the filing of a winding up petition is void ab initio and does not confer any rights. A decree of deemed tenancy obtained after such licence is a nullity and not binding on the Official Liquidator.

Judgment Excerpts

By the order dated 13th April 1995 the learned Single Judge was pleased to make the company application absolute in terms of prayer clauses3 (a), (b) and (c). The company application was moved by Respondent no.3 before us which is the original Applicant.

Procedural History

Company Petition No.404 of 1986 was filed for winding up. Company Application No.482 of 1993 was filed by respondent no.3 seeking declarations. Single Judge allowed the application on 13th April 1995. Appeal No.519 of 1995 was filed by the appellant under clause 15 of Letters Patent.

Acts & Sections

  • Letters Patent: Clause 15
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Occupier in Company Liquidation - Licence Created After Winding Up Petition is Void. Official Liquidator Entitled to Recover Possession from Trespasser Despite Deemed Tenancy Decree.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor Despite Pending CBI Investigation. The court held that pendency of criminal investigation does not automatically justify stay of arbitration proceedings and that th...