Search Results for "nullity decree"

393 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 393 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance, Directs Execution of Possession in Favor of Appellants. Collusion Between Vendors and Respondents to Frustrate Decree Cannot Defeat the Fruits of Justice

Specific Performance and Possession – The Supreme Court held that the appellants were entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement and po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Objection to Execution of Decree Based on Jurisdictional Challenge Under Section 39(4) CPC. Court Holds That Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Execution by the Court That Passed the Decree When the Property Is Situated Outside Its Local Limits.

The present chamber summons arose out of a suit filed by ICICI Ltd, as Debenture Trustees, against Kothri Industrial Corporation Ltd and others for re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Section 32M Cannot Be Challenged After 9 Years. The Court Held That the Certificate Is Conclusive and the Landlord Cannot Seek Termination of Tenancy After the Tenant Has Purchased the Land.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding agricultural land bearing Gat No. 98 in village Tilleha...