Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder of Minor Girl in Eve-Teasing Revenge Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed based on credible eyewitness testimony and motive established by prior eve-teasing incident and father's intervention.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Ramesh Baburao Wagh, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of a minor girl named Chayya. The prosecution case was that the appellant had been eve-teasing Chayya and her sister Tulsa while they walked to school. Their father confronted the appellant and slapped him in public, which enraged the appellant. On 15th December 1997, while the girls were on their way to school, the appellant overtook them and prevented them from proceeding. The prosecution alleged that the appellant then murdered Chayya. The trial court convicted the appellant based on the eyewitness testimony of Tulsa, the sister, and the established motive. The appellant appealed against the conviction and life sentence. The Bombay High Court, after scrutinizing the record and evidence, found no reason to doubt the trial court's decision. The court noted that the prosecution had established the motive of revenge due to the father's intervention. The eyewitness account of Tulsa was found credible and consistent. The court upheld the conviction and dismissed the appeal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on eyewitness testimony and motive - The appellant was convicted for murdering a minor girl after he had eve-teased her and her sister, and the father had slapped him. The court upheld the conviction, finding the eyewitness account of the sister credible and the motive established. (Paras 1-3)

B) Evidence - Credibility of Child Witness - Section 118 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - The testimony of the minor sister (Tulsa) was found reliable as she was a natural witness and her evidence was consistent. The court held that the trial court correctly relied on her testimony. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of a minor girl is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence of life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Motive
  • Eyewitness Testimony
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Indian Penal Code
  • 1860
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (04) 70

Criminal Appeal No.325 of 2001

2005-04-12

V.G. Palshikar, Smt. Nishita Mhatre

Mrs. Revati Mohite Dere (for Appellant), Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal (Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent)

Ramesh Baburao Wagh

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction and life sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of a minor girl, Chayya, allegedly in revenge for being slapped by the victim's father after eve-teasing.

Previous Decisions

Sessions Judge, Thane convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for life in Sessions Case No.214 of 1998 on 11th December 2000.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of motive and eyewitness testimony.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued against the conviction, but the court found no merit. Prosecution relied on eyewitness testimony of the victim's sister and established motive.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the prosecution had established the motive for murder (revenge for being slapped) and the eyewitness testimony of the victim's sister was credible and sufficient to sustain the conviction under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

we have scrutinised the record and the evidence available before us and we have no manner of doubt that the decision appealed against must be upheld. The prosecution has established that Chayya and Tulsa had been teased by the Appellant on their way to school.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case No.214 of 1998 on 11th December 2000 for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed to the Bombay High Court in Criminal Appeal No.325 of 2001, which was dismissed on 12th April 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder of Minor Girl in Eve-Teasing Revenge Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed based on credible eyewitness testimony and motive established by prior eve-teasing incident and father's interv...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Executability of Specific Performance Decree Despite Delay in Deposit of Balance Consideration. Non-Deposit Within Stipulated Time Does Not Automatically Render Decree Inexecutable; Judgment-Debtor Must Seek Rescission Under Sec...