Bombay High Court at Goa Directs Registration of FIR and Compensation for Assault on Prisoner in Custody. State Liable for Custodial Violence Under Prisoner Rights.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 47
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by three under-trial prisoners, Mustaq Ahmed, Vinesh Narayan Faldessai, and Jovita Ryan Dos Remedios Pinto, who were lodged in Sub Jail, Sada, Vasco-Da-Gama. They alleged that they were subjected to assault by jail authorities while in custody. The petitioners, represented by Advocate Ryan Menezes, contended that the assault was evidenced by a medical certificate and that this Court in a previous case, Rajendra Singh v. State of Goa (Criminal Writ Petition No.114/2012), had ordered compensation for a prisoner who suffered assault while fighting in custody. Additionally, a report by the Additional Sessions Judge, who had visited the prison, formed part of the records, indicating that an offence had to be registered and an inquiry conducted. The State, represented by Public Prosecutor S.R. Rivankar, conceded that an offence had to be registered based on the prisoner's complaint and also referred to the Additional Sessions Judge's report. The court, after hearing both sides, directed the respondents to register an FIR based on the complaint of the petitioner Mustaq Ahmed and to pay compensation of Rs. 50,000 to him for the injuries suffered. The court also directed that the investigation be conducted by an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police and that a report be submitted to the court within three months. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Prisoner Rights - Assault in Custody - Compensation - The petitioner, an under-trial prisoner, alleged assault by jail authorities. The court, relying on a medical certificate and a report by the Additional Sessions Judge, directed registration of an FIR and payment of compensation for the injuries suffered. Held that the State is liable to compensate prisoners for custodial violence and must register offences based on complaints. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner-prisoner was subjected to assault while in custody and whether the State is liable to register an FIR and pay compensation for the injuries suffered.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to register an FIR based on the complaint of petitioner Mustaq Ahmed and to pay compensation of Rs. 50,000 to him for the injuries suffered. The investigation was to be conducted by an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police, and a report was to be submitted to the court within three months. The petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Prisoner rights
  • Assault in custody
  • Compensation for custodial violence
  • Registration of FIR
  • Duty of State to protect prisoners
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (04) 76

Criminal Writ Petition No.59/2013

2017-04-03

F.M. Reis, Nutan D. Sardessai

Ryan Menezes, S.R. Rivankar

Mustaq Ahmed, Vinesh Narayan Faldessai, Jovita Ryan Dos Remedios Pinto

State of Goa, Mahesh Fadte, Uday Shirodkar, Tulshidas Gadekar, Kaitan Godinho, Rama Pandhari, Supdt. Of Jail, I.G.Prison

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and compensation for assault on prisoners in custody.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought registration of FIR and compensation for assault suffered while in judicial custody.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged they were assaulted by jail authorities while lodged in Sub Jail, Sada.

Previous Decisions

In Rajendra Singh v. State of Goa (Criminal Writ Petition No.114/2012), this Court had ordered compensation for a prisoner assaulted while fighting in custody.

Issues

Whether the petitioner-prisoner was subjected to assault while in custody? Whether the State is liable to register an FIR and pay compensation for custodial violence?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners' counsel argued that the assault was evidenced by a medical certificate and a report by the Additional Sessions Judge, and that an offence must be registered and inquiry conducted. State's Public Prosecutor conceded that an offence had to be registered based on the prisoner's complaint and referred to the Additional Sessions Judge's report.

Ratio Decidendi

The State is liable to compensate prisoners for custodial violence and must register offences based on complaints of assault while in custody.

Judgment Excerpts

It was the contention of Shri Menezes that the petitioner - a prisoner was subjected to assault and effect thereof was supplemented on the basis of the medical certificate indicating the nature of the assault on the prisoner. Shri S.R. Rivankar, learned Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State conceded in fairness that an offence had to be registered based on the complaint of the prisoner.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No.59/2013 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking directions for registration of FIR and compensation for assault suffered while in custody. The court heard the matter and disposed it on 3rd April 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 154
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Directs Registration of FIR and Compensation for Assault on Prisoner in Custody. State Liable for Custodial Violence Under Prisoner Rights.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Promotion Dispute — No Notice Given Before Cancelling Promotion After Superannuation. The court held that cancellation of promotion and recovery of excess payment without prior no...