Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Contempt Order Against Educational Trust for Non-Compliance of Tribunal Order. Wilful Disobedience of Reinstatement and Back Wages Direction Under Maharashtra Universities Act Upheld.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 94
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present Writ Petition was filed by Dilip Kapoor, President of Suman Educational Trust and another, challenging the judgment and order dated 22.06.2022 passed by the Presiding Officer, Mumbai University and College Tribunal, Mumbai in Contempt Application No.05 of 2019. The Tribunal had partly allowed the contempt application filed by Respondent No.1, Bhagat Mahesh Bhaga, holding that the petitioners had wilfully disobeyed the Tribunal's earlier order dated 04.08.2014 which directed reinstatement of the respondent and payment of back wages. The facts reveal that on 04.08.2014, the Tribunal had passed an order in favour of the respondent, but the petitioners failed to comply. Consequently, the respondent filed a contempt application. The Tribunal, after hearing the parties, found that the petitioners had not complied with the order and directed them to comply within a specified period. Aggrieved, the petitioners approached the High Court. The High Court, after hearing the advocates for both sides, examined the Tribunal's order and found no infirmity. The Court held that the Tribunal had correctly appreciated the facts and law, and the contempt was established. The petition was dismissed, and the Tribunal's order was upheld. The Court directed the petitioners to comply with the Tribunal's order within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Contempt of Court - Wilful Disobedience - University and College Tribunal - Contempt Application under Maharashtra Universities Act - The Tribunal partly allowed the contempt application finding that the petitioners had not complied with the earlier order directing reinstatement and payment of back wages - Held that the petitioners were guilty of contempt and directed compliance within a specified period (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents committed contempt of the Tribunal's order by wilfully disobeying the directions to reinstate the employee and pay back wages.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition and upheld the Tribunal's order dated 22.06.2022. The petitioners were directed to comply with the Tribunal's order within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Contempt of Court
  • Wilful Disobedience
  • Compliance of Tribunal Orders
  • University and College Tribunal
  • Maharashtra Universities Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (10) 17

Writ Petition No. 11161 of 2022

2025-10-15

Milind N. Jadhav, J.

Mr. Mahesh Vijay Rawool, Advocate for Petitioners; Mr. C.R. Sadasivan, Advocate for Respondent No.1; Ms. P.J. Gavhane, AGP for Respondent – State

Dilip Kapoor, President, Suman Educational Trust and Anr.

Bhagat Mahesh Bhaga and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging the order of the Mumbai University and College Tribunal in a contempt application.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the Tribunal's order holding them guilty of contempt.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal partly allowed the contempt application filed by Respondent No.1 for non-compliance of its earlier order dated 04.08.2014.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal had passed an order on 04.08.2014 directing reinstatement and payment of back wages to Respondent No.1.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal's order holding the petitioners guilty of contempt was justified. Whether the petitioners had wilfully disobeyed the Tribunal's order.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they had complied with the order or that there was no wilful disobedience. Respondent No.1 contended that the petitioners had not complied with the reinstatement and back wages direction.

Ratio Decidendi

Wilful disobedience of a Tribunal's order constitutes contempt, and the Tribunal has the power to enforce compliance through contempt proceedings under the Maharashtra Universities Act.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard Mr. Rawool, learned Advocate for Petitioners, Mr. Sadasivan, learned Advocate for Respondent No.1 and Ms. Gavhane, learned AGP for Respondent – State. The present Writ Petition assails judgment and order dated 22.06.2022 passed by the Presiding Officer, Mumbai University and College Tribunal, Mumbai in Contempt Application No.05 of 2019 whereby Contempt Application filed by Respondent No.1 was partly allowed.

Procedural History

On 04.08.2014, the Tribunal passed an order in favour of Respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 filed Contempt Application No.05 of 2019 for non-compliance. The Tribunal partly allowed the contempt application on 22.06.2022. The petitioners filed the present Writ Petition challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Universities Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Contempt Order Against Educational Trust for Non-Compliance of Tribunal Order. Wilful Disobedience of Reinstatement and Back Wages Direction Under Maharashtra Universities Act Upheld.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Revision Against Maintenance Order Under Section 125 CrPC — Wife's Refusal to Live with Husband Justified by Cruelty and Demand for Dowry. The Family Court's concurrent findings of fact regarding cruelty and do...