Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Unopposed Gram Panchayat Member for Non-Submission of Election Expense Account. Section 14B of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 does not require filing of expense statement when candidate is elected unopposed without incurring any expenditure.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Dipmala w/o Ravindra Chachane, was elected unopposed as a member of Gram Panchayat Sarra in July 2015. The Additional Collector issued a notice under Section 14B of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 requiring her to submit a statement of election expenses. The petitioner replied that since all members were elected unopposed without any contest, no expenses were incurred and no statement was submitted. The Additional Collector disqualified her for non-compliance. The petitioner appealed under Section 16(2) of the Act, but the Additional Commissioner upheld the disqualification. The High Court considered whether the failure to submit the statement of accounts constituted a reasonable cause. It held that when a candidate is elected unopposed, there is no requirement to incur any election expenses, and the explanation that no expenses were incurred is a reasonable cause for non-submission. The court quashed the orders of disqualification and directed the respondents to treat the petitioner as continuing as a member of the Gram Panchayat.

Headnote

A) Panchayati Raj - Election Expenses - Disqualification - Section 14B Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Unopposed Election - The petitioner was elected unopposed as a member of Gram Panchayat and did not submit a statement of election expenses. The Additional Collector disqualified her under Section 14B. The High Court held that when a candidate is elected unopposed without any contest, there is no requirement to incur election expenses, and the failure to submit a statement of accounts constitutes a reasonable cause. The disqualification was quashed. (Paras 2-6)

B) Panchayati Raj - Appeal - Section 16(2) Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Appellate Authority - The Additional Commissioner upheld the disqualification without considering the fact that the petitioner was elected unopposed. The High Court set aside the appellate order as it failed to appreciate the reasonable cause for non-submission. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a candidate elected unopposed to a Gram Panchayat can be disqualified under Section 14B of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 for failure to submit a statement of election expenses when no expenses were incurred.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The order dated 14.09.2016 passed by the Additional Commissioner and the order of disqualification passed by the Additional Collector are quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to treat the petitioner as continuing as a member of Gram Panchayat Sarra.

Law Points

  • Election expenses
  • Disqualification
  • Unopposed election
  • Section 14B Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act
  • 1959
  • Reasonable cause
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (07) 202

Writ Petition No.6339/2016

2019-07-31

A.S. Chandurkar, J.

Shri I.N. Choudhari for petitioner; Shri A.V. Palshikar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents

Smt. Dipmala w/o Ravindra Chachane

The Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Division; Upper Collector, Gondia; Tahsildar, Tirora

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging disqualification order under Section 14B of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 for non-submission of election expense statement.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of disqualification order and restoration as member of Gram Panchayat.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was disqualified for failing to submit statement of election expenses despite being elected unopposed and incurring no expenses.

Previous Decisions

Additional Collector disqualified petitioner; Additional Commissioner upheld disqualification in appeal.

Issues

Whether failure to submit statement of election expenses when elected unopposed constitutes a reasonable cause under Section 14B of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that being elected unopposed, no expenses were incurred and thus no statement was required; the reason for non-submission was reasonable. Respondents argued that the election process was completed and the statement was mandatory regardless of being unopposed.

Ratio Decidendi

When a candidate is elected unopposed without any contest, there is no requirement to incur election expenses, and the failure to submit a statement of accounts constitutes a reasonable cause under Section 14B of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Disqualification for non-submission in such circumstances is not warranted.

Judgment Excerpts

The fact that all the members were elected unopposed itself indicated that the petitioner was not required to either canvas or seek any vote in her favour. In the light of the fact that the petitioner was elected unopposed, there was no occasion for her to incur any election expenses. The failure to submit the statement of accounts of election expenses was thus on account of a reasonable cause.

Procedural History

Elections to Gram Panchayat Sarra held in July 2015; petitioner elected unopposed. Additional Collector issued notice under Section 14B on 26.01.2016; petitioner replied on 25.02.2016. Additional Collector passed disqualification order. Petitioner appealed under Section 16(2) to Additional Commissioner, who upheld disqualification on 14.09.2016. Petitioner filed writ petition in High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959: Section 14B, Section 16(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Workman in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Termination Held Illegal Despite Closure of Division. Employer's failure to prove bona fide closure and non-compliance with Section 25FFF of Industrial Disputes Act,...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions to Quash FIR in Criminal Conspiracy Case — Petitioners Failed to Show FIR Lacked Prima Facie Case or Was Abuse of Process. The court held that the FIR could not be quashed as the allegations required inve...