Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Criminal Proceedings in Assault Case Due to Compromise Between Parties. Section 324 IPC Offence Held to be Compoundable with Court Permission, and Proceedings Quashed in Exercise of Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 40
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, Kailas Prabhakar Shinde, Pandurang Asaram Shinde, Prabhakar Radhakisan Shinde, Vatasalabai Prabhakar Shinde, and Sunita Kailas Shinde, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 154 of 2015 registered at Taluka Jalna Police Station, District Jalna, for the offence punishable under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and the consequent proceedings in R.C.C. No. 491 of 2015 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalna. The FIR was lodged by respondent No. 2, Bharat Baliram Bendre, alleging that on 15 June 2015, the applicants entered his place, pulled down a cattle shed, and assaulted him and his father with weapons including an axe and an iron bar. The applicants and the complainant subsequently entered into a compromise, and the complainant filed an affidavit stating that the dispute was amicably settled and he had no objection to the quashing of the FIR and proceedings. The Court considered the nature of the offence under Section 324 IPC, which is compoundable with the permission of the court under Section 320 of the CrPC. The Court observed that since the parties had settled the matter and the chances of conviction were bleak, continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of the court. Accordingly, the Court allowed the application, quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings, and disposed of the application. Rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Compromise - The applicants sought quashing of FIR No. 154 of 2015 and RCC No. 491 of 2015 for offence under Section 324 IPC on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute. The Court held that since the offence under Section 324 IPC is compoundable with the permission of the court, and the parties have settled the matter, continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. The FIR and proceedings were quashed. (Paras 1-5)

B) Indian Penal Code - Compounding of Offence - Section 324 IPC - The offence of voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means is compoundable with the permission of the court under Section 320 CrPC. The Court noted that the parties have settled the dispute and the complainant has no objection to quashing. Hence, the proceedings were quashed. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings for offence under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code can be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the application, quashed FIR No. 154 of 2015 and all consequential proceedings in R.C.C. No. 491 of 2015. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Compounding of offence under Section 324 IPC is permissible with court permission
  • Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be used to quash proceedings when parties have compromised and chances of conviction are bleak
  • Settlement between parties can be considered to prevent abuse of process of court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (07) 23

Criminal Application No. 3459 of 2018

2019-07-09

T.V. Nalawade, K.K. Sonawane

Mr. K.F. Shingare, Mr. A.S. Shinde, Mr. S.R. Zambare h/f Mr. Srikant Kawade

Kailas S/o Prabhakar Shinde, Pandurang S/o Asaram Shinde, Prabhakar S/o Radhakisan Shinde, Vatasalabai W/o Prabhakar Shinde, Sunita W/o Kailas Shinde

The State of Maharashtra, Bharat S/o Baliram Bendre

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 154 of 2015 and R.C.C. No. 491 of 2015

Filing Reason

The applicants were accused in an FIR for offence under Section 324 IPC; they sought quashing on the basis of compromise with the complainant.

Issues

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings for offence under Section 324 IPC can be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties?

Submissions/Arguments

The applicants submitted that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the complainant has no objection to quashing. The complainant filed an affidavit stating that the matter is settled and he has no objection to quashing.

Ratio Decidendi

When the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the offence is compoundable, continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of the court. Hence, the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash the FIR and proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The present proceeding is filed for relief of quashing of FIR No. 154 of 2015 registered with Taluka Jalna police station district Jalna for the offence punishable under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and also for quashing of proceeding R.C.C. No. 491 of 2015 filed in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalna in C.R. No. 154 of 2015. The offence under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code is compoundable with the permission of the Court. The parties have settled the dispute. In view of the settlement, the chances of conviction are bleak. Hence, this Court holds that it is a fit case to exercise the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Procedural History

The FIR was registered on 15.6.2015. The applicants filed Criminal Application No. 3459 of 2018 before the High Court seeking quashing. The Court heard the matter and passed judgment on 9.7.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 324
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482, 320
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Criminal Proceedings in Assault Case Due to Compromise Between Parties. Section 324 IPC Offence Held to be Compoundable with Court Permission, and Proceedings Quashed in Exercise of Inherent Powers Under Section 482 ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Against Nashik Municipal Corporation for Non-Compliance with Government Resolution on Religious Structures. Court Directs Publication of List of Religious Shrines Before Demolition to Ensure Natural...