Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Zilla Parishad Challenging Appointment of Disabled Candidate — Spine Deformity Held Covered Under 'One Leg' Disability Category. Court upholds Commissioner's order directing appointment of candidate with KyphoScoliotic Deformity to post reserved for persons with one leg disability under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 130
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, the District Selection Committee and Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Akola, challenged an order dated 17.11.2017 passed by the Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, Maharashtra State, directing them to appoint respondent No.1, Ku. Sangita Trambakrao Puri, to the post of Nursing Officer (female). The respondent No.1 had applied pursuant to an advertisement dated 22.8.2014 that reserved six posts for disabled persons with 'one leg' disability. She submitted a disability certificate stating she suffered from 'KyphoScoliotic Deformity DSpine' with 58% permanent disability. She cleared the written examination and was called for document verification, but the petitioners issued a letter on 25.2.2016 stating she was not eligible because her disability did not match the advertised category. The respondent No.1 approached the Commissioner, who directed her appointment. The High Court upheld the Commissioner's order, holding that the disability certificate was sufficient to claim reservation for 'one leg' disability as the condition was a locomotor disability affecting the leg. The court emphasized that the employer cannot reject a candidate based on a hyper-technical interpretation of the disability category when the certificate indicates a permanent disability. The writ petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Disability Law - Reservation for Disabled Persons - Interpretation of Disability Certificate - The issue was whether a candidate with a spine deformity (KyphoScoliotic Deformity) could claim reservation for 'one leg' disability under the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. The court held that the disability certificate, which indicated a permanent and non-progressive condition affecting the spine, was sufficient to claim the benefit of reservation for 'one leg' disability, as the condition was a locomotor disability that affected the leg. The employer's rejection was set aside. (Paras 4-10)

B) Administrative Law - Appointment - Compliance with Disability Certificate - The court held that the employer cannot go behind the disability certificate issued by the competent medical authority. The certificate must be accepted as conclusive proof of the nature and extent of disability for the purpose of reservation. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent No.1, who had a disability certificate for KyphoScoliotic Deformity of the spine, could be denied appointment to the post of Nursing Officer (female) reserved for persons with 'one leg' disability under the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the order of the Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities directing the petitioners to appoint respondent No.1 to the post of Nursing Officer (female).

Law Points

  • Disability certificate specifying spine deformity (KyphoScoliotic Deformity) is sufficient to claim reservation for 'one leg' disability under the Persons with Disabilities Act
  • 1995
  • even if not explicitly mentioned as 'one leg'
  • the employer cannot reject a candidate on the ground that the disability does not match the advertised category if the certificate indicates a locomotor disability affecting the leg.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (04) 203

WRIT PETITION NO. 768 OF 2018

2019-04-18

MANISH PITALE, J.

Mr. B.N. Jaipurkar for petitioners, Mr. Apurv De for respondent no.1, Mr. K.L. Dharmadhikari, A.G.P for respondent no.2

Member Secretary, District Selection Committee, District Health Officer, Zilla Parishad, Akola & Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad Akola

Ku. Sangita Trambakrao Puri & Divisional Commissioner for persons with disabilities, Maharashtra State, Pune

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging order of Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities directing appointment of a disabled candidate to a post reserved for persons with one leg disability.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of order dated 17.11.2017 passed by respondent No.2 directing appointment of respondent No.1.

Filing Reason

Petitioners contended that respondent No.1's disability (spine deformity) did not match the advertised category of 'one leg' disability.

Previous Decisions

Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities passed order dated 17.11.2017 directing appointment of respondent No.1.

Issues

Whether the disability certificate for KyphoScoliotic Deformity of spine qualifies as 'one leg' disability for reservation purposes under the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Whether the employer can reject a candidate based on a mismatch between the disability certificate and the advertised category.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that respondent No.1's disability was of the spine, not of one leg, and therefore she was not entitled to reservation for 'one leg' disability. Respondent No.1 argued that the disability certificate indicated a permanent locomotor disability affecting the leg, and the employer cannot go behind the certificate.

Ratio Decidendi

A disability certificate issued by a competent medical authority is conclusive proof of the nature and extent of disability for the purpose of reservation under the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. The employer cannot reject a candidate on the ground that the disability does not match the advertised category if the certificate indicates a permanent locomotor disability.

Judgment Excerpts

The respondent No.1 applied for the said post of Nursing Officer (female) as she had the necessary qualifications for the said post. The disability certificate specified that the respondent No.1 suffered from disability of the spine i.e. ''KyphoScoliotic Deformity DSpine'', further stating that the per centage of disability was 58 % and that the said condition was permanent, non progressive and not likely to improve.

Procedural History

Advertisement issued on 22.8.2014; respondent No.1 applied; she cleared written examination; called for document verification on 23.6.2015; petitioners issued letter dated 25.2.2016 stating she was not eligible; respondent No.1 approached Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities; Commissioner passed order dated 17.11.2017 directing appointment; petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 768 of 2018 challenging the order; High Court dismissed the petition on 18.04.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Zilla Parishad Challenging Appointment of Disabled Candidate — Spine Deformity Held Covered Under 'One Leg' Disability Category. Court upholds Commissioner's order directing appointment of candidate with Kyph...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarifies Licensing Requirements for Driving Light Motor Vehicles Used as Transport Vehicles. Interpretation of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 regarding LMV License and Transport Vehicles, ensuring road safety and livelihood considerations.