Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Panchayat Samiti Member for Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificate in Light of Amended Section 12A of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The court applied retrospective effect to beneficial amendments extending time for submission of caste validity certificate, saving the petitioner's membership.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 61
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sau. Sujata W/o Prabhu Fendar, was elected as a member of the Panchayat Samiti from a seat reserved for woman (OBC) in an election held on 06/07/2015. At the time of filing her nomination, she submitted her caste certificate but not the caste validity certificate, as it had not yet been issued by the Scrutiny Committee. Under Section 12A of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 (as it then stood), she was required to submit the caste validity certificate within six months from the date of declaration of the election result. She failed to do so because the certificate was not issued in time. Consequently, the Collector, by order dated 27/01/2017, disqualified her from continuing as a member. The petitioner challenged this order by way of a writ petition. During the pendency of the petition, the legislature amended Section 12A of the Act of 1961 through the Maharashtra Act No. LXVI of 2018 (published on 14/12/2018) and subsequently through the Maharashtra Ordinance No. II of 2019 (published on 14/02/2019). These amendments retrospectively extended the time for submission of the caste validity certificate and provided that no disqualification shall be incurred if the certificate is submitted within the extended period. The court considered the effect of these amendments. It held that the amendments are beneficial in nature and intended to protect members who could not obtain the certificate due to delays beyond their control. Applying the principle of retrospective operation of beneficial legislation, the court quashed the Collector's order of disqualification and directed that the petitioner be reinstated as a member of the Panchayat Samiti, subject to her submitting the caste validity certificate within the time prescribed by the amended provisions.

Headnote

A) Panchayati Raj - Disqualification of Member - Caste Validity Certificate - Section 12A of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 - The petitioner was disqualified for not submitting caste validity certificate within six months of election. Subsequent amendments (Maharashtra Act No. LXVI of 2018 and Maharashtra Ordinance No. II of 2019) retrospectively extended the time for submission. The court held that the amendments are beneficial and must be applied retrospectively to save the petitioner's membership. (Paras 2-5)

B) Statutory Interpretation - Retrospective Operation of Amendment - Beneficial Legislation - The amendments to Section 12A were intended to protect members who could not obtain caste validity certificates in time due to delays by the Scrutiny Committee. The court held that such beneficial provisions should be given retrospective effect to avoid disqualification. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner's disqualification as a member of Panchayat Samiti for non-submission of caste validity certificate within six months can be sustained in view of the subsequent amendments to Section 12A of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961, which retrospectively extend the time for submission.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The order dated 27/01/2017 passed by the Collector, Bhandara disqualifying the petitioner is quashed and set aside. The petitioner is entitled to continue as a member of the Panchayat Samiti, subject to her submitting the caste validity certificate within the time prescribed by the amended provisions of Section 12A of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

Law Points

  • Retrospective amendment
  • beneficial legislation
  • disqualification
  • caste validity certificate
  • Section 12A
  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act
  • 1961
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (03) 130

WRIT PETITION NO.1038/2017

2019-02-28

Z.A.HAQ, J.

Shri A.D. Girdekar for the petitioner, Shri V.P. Maldure AGP for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4, Ms. M.P. Munshi for respondent no. 3

Sau. Sujata W/o Prabhu Fendar

The State of Maharashtra, The Collector, Bhandara, The Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad, Bhandara, The Tahsildar, Bhandara

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging disqualification of a Panchayat Samiti member for non-submission of caste validity certificate.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the Collector's order dated 27/01/2017 disqualifying the petitioner and reinstatement as member of Panchayat Samiti.

Filing Reason

The petitioner was disqualified for not submitting caste validity certificate within six months of election, despite having submitted the caste certificate. The certificate was not issued by the Scrutiny Committee in time.

Previous Decisions

The Collector, Bhandara, by order dated 27/01/2017 disqualified the petitioner from continuing as member of Panchayat Samiti.

Issues

Whether the disqualification of the petitioner under Section 12A of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 is sustainable in view of the subsequent amendments that retrospectively extend the time for submission of caste validity certificate.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that she could not submit the caste validity certificate within six months because the Scrutiny Committee had not issued it in time. The subsequent amendments to Section 12A are beneficial and should be applied retrospectively to save her membership. The respondents opposed the petition, but the court considered the amendments and held in favor of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi

Beneficial amendments to Section 12A of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961, which retrospectively extend the time for submission of caste validity certificate, must be applied to pending cases to avoid disqualification of members who could not obtain the certificate in time due to delays by the Scrutiny Committee.

Judgment Excerpts

The provisions of Section 12A of the Act of 1961 were amended initially by the Maharashtra Village Panchayats and the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Amendment) Act, 2018... The position as it stands today i.e. after issuance of the Maharashtra Ordinance No. II of 2019, is that any person who has obtained the caste certificate or the caste validity certificate after...

Procedural History

The petitioner was elected on 06/07/2015. The Collector disqualified her on 27/01/2017. She filed Writ Petition No.1038/2017 challenging the disqualification. During pendency, Section 12A was amended by Maharashtra Act No. LXVI of 2018 (published 14/12/2018) and further by Maharashtra Ordinance No. II of 2019 (published 14/02/2019). The court heard the matter on 28/02/2019 and allowed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961: Section 12A
  • Maharashtra Act No. LXVI of 2018: Section 2
  • Maharashtra Ordinance No. II of 2019: Section 2
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Panchayat Samiti Member for Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificate in Light of Amended Section 12A of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The court applied retrospective eff...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Pvt Ltd. Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Scheme does not override State Commission's power to determine tariff for wind e...