Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Collector's Order Declaring No Right to Gairan Land. Encroachment on Government Land Cannot Be Regularized Without Following Due Process Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 16
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, eight individuals from Mategaon, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 13.07.1994 passed by the District Collector, Aurangabad, which declared that they have no right to the Gairan land and that their alleged encroachment cannot be regularized. The petitioners claimed to be in possession of the land and sought regularization. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the Collector, opposed the petition. The court analyzed the nature of Gairan land as government land and held that no right accrues from encroachment. The court found that the Collector had followed due process under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and that the petitioners were given an opportunity to be heard. The court also noted that regularization is a policy matter and cannot be claimed as a right. The writ petition was dismissed, and the Collector's order was upheld. The court directed that the petitioners be evicted if they continue to encroach, but no costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Land Law - Gairan Land - Government Land - Encroachment - The petitioners claimed rights over Gairan land based on alleged possession and encroachment. The Collector declared they have no right and directed eviction. The court held that Gairan land is government land and no right accrues from encroachment. The Collector's order was upheld. (Paras 1-3)

B) Land Law - Eviction - Due Process - The petitioners argued that they were not heard before the order. The court noted that the Collector's order was based on a report and the petitioners had opportunity to represent. The court held that the procedure under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code was followed. (Paras 2-3)

C) Land Law - Regularization - Policy - The petitioners sought regularization of encroachment. The court held that regularization is a policy matter and cannot be claimed as a right. The Collector's decision not to regularize was upheld. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners have any right to the Gairan land and whether the Collector's order declaring no right and directing eviction is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed. Collector's order dated 13.07.1994 upheld. No costs.

Law Points

  • Gairan land is government land
  • encroachment cannot be regularized without due process
  • Collector has authority to evict encroachers
  • no right accrues from encroachment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (01) 172

WRIT PETITION NO.3386 OF 1994 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2276 OF 1996

2019-02-05

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE

Shri A.S.Deshpande for Petitioners, Shri N.T.Bhagat (AGP) for Respondent Nos.1 to 3, Shri M.G.Kolse Patil for Respondent Nos.4 to 32

Pandu s/o Dhondiba Nikale and others

The State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging Collector's order declaring no right to Gairan land and directing eviction.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of Collector's order dated 13.07.1994 and regularization of their alleged encroachment.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were aggrieved by the Collector's order that they have no right to the Gairan land and their encroachment cannot be regularized.

Previous Decisions

Collector's order dated 13.07.1994 declared no right to Gairan land and directed eviction.

Issues

Whether the petitioners have any right to the Gairan land? Whether the Collector's order is sustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they are in possession of the Gairan land and sought regularization. Respondents argued that Gairan land is government land and encroachment cannot be regularized.

Ratio Decidendi

Gairan land is government land and no right accrues from encroachment. The Collector has authority to evict encroachers and regularization is a policy matter not enforceable as a right.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioners are aggrieved by the impugned order dated 13.07.1994 by which, the District Collector, Aurangabad has declared that the Petitioners have no right to the Gairan land and their alleged encroachment cannot be regularized. Gairan land is government land and no right accrues from encroachment.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.3386 of 1994 challenging the Collector's order dated 13.07.1994. The matter was reserved on 24.01.2019 and judgment pronounced on 05.02.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Land Revenue Code:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Collector's Order Declaring No Right to Gairan Land. Encroachment on Government Land Cannot Be Regularized Without Following Due Process Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Correction of Minor's Name in School Records Under Registration of Birth and Death Act, 1969 — Petitioner's Name to Be Corrected from 'Pankhaniya Krisha Dineshbhai' to 'Pankhaniya Krisha Dineshkumar' in School Leaving Cert...