Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Double Murder Based on Extra-Judicial Confession and Medical Evidence. Extra-judicial confession to police patil found voluntary and corroborated by medical evidence of homicidal deaths.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Barku Tulshiram More, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of his wife Laxmibai and his father-in-law Karbhari under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution case was that on 14 February 2004, the appellant went to the police patil, Madhukar Shinde, and confessed that he had killed his wife and father-in-law. The police patil lodged an FIR, and investigation revealed that the deaths were homicidal. The post-mortem reports indicated that Laxmibai died due to hemorrhagic shock from subdural hematoma, and Karbhari died due to hemorrhagic shock from skull fracture. The appellant challenged his conviction, arguing that the extra-judicial confession was not reliable. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the extra-judicial confession was made voluntarily to a person in authority (police patil) and was corroborated by medical evidence. The court noted that the appellant had no reason to falsely implicate himself. The court also considered that the appellant had called his father-in-law for fixing a date for his son's hair-cutting ceremony, and the incident occurred shortly after. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and dismissed the appeal, confirming the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Extra-judicial confession - Corroboration - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 - The appellant was convicted for murdering his wife and father-in-law based on his extra-judicial confession to the police patil. The court held that the extra-judicial confession was voluntary and truthful, and was corroborated by medical evidence showing homicidal deaths. The appeal was dismissed. (Paras 1-11)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC based on extra-judicial confession and medical evidence is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 302 IPC are confirmed.

Law Points

  • Extra-judicial confession
  • Corroboration
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Double murder
  • Medical evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (11) 56

Criminal Appeal No. 753 of 2005

2012-11-29

Mrs. V.K. Tahilramani, A. R. Joshi

Mrs. Rohini Dandekar (for Appellant), Mr. D. P. Adsule (for Respondent)

Barku Tulshiram More

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murdering his wife and father-in-law

Previous Decisions

Sessions Court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment

Issues

Whether the extra-judicial confession made by the appellant to the police patil is reliable and voluntary. Whether the medical evidence corroborates the confession and establishes homicidal death.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the extra-judicial confession was not reliable and that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Respondent argued that the extra-judicial confession was voluntary and truthful, and was corroborated by medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

An extra-judicial confession made to a person in authority, if found voluntary and truthful, can form the basis of conviction if corroborated by medical evidence. In this case, the appellant's confession to the police patil was voluntary and corroborated by post-mortem reports showing homicidal deaths.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant/original Appellant has directed this Appeal against the Judgment and order dated 14th March, 2005, passed by the learned First Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge Nashik, in Sessions Case No.138 of 2004. This is a case of double murder. P.W.No.1 Madhukar Shinde who is the police patil of village Dahiwad was told by the Appellant that he had killed his wife and his fatherinlaw.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Court on 14 March 2005. He appealed to the High Court, which heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 29 November 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Delay Condonation in Family Court Appeal — Wife's Claim for Half Share in Flat. Delay of 62 days condoned as applicant was pursuing remedy before Apex Court and was not negligent.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Double Murder Based on Extra-Judicial Confession and Medical Evidence. Extra-judicial confession to police patil found voluntary and corroborated by medical evidence of homicidal deaths.