Supreme Court Bans Unauthorized Disinfection Tunnels on Humans in COVID-19 Public Interest Litigation. Right to Health Under Article 21 Violated by Spraying of Disinfectants Without Ministry Approval.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed in public interest under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a ban on spraying of all kinds of disinfectants on human beings, which was being done purportedly to protect against COVID-19. The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11.03.2020. On 29.03.2020, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare issued guidelines on disinfection of public places. Subsequently, on 18.04.2020, an advisory was issued against spraying disinfectants on people. Despite this, various organizations and public authorities started using spraying tunnels and other measures to disinfect humans. The petitioner relied on the advisory and WHO publications stating that spraying disinfectants on the body is dangerous. The court issued notice on 10.08.2020. The Union of India filed a counter affidavit on 01.09.2020, bringing on record the advisory and minutes of a meeting dated 09.06.2020 where spraying disinfectants was not recommended. On 07.09.2020, the court noted the Union's submission that directions would be issued. A compliance affidavit dated 28.09.2020 brought an O.M. dated 23.09.2020 reiterating that spraying of individuals or groups is not recommended. An intervention application was filed by Ideal Flow Pvt. Ltd., which developed a pressurized steam disinfectant chamber using natural oils, opposing a blanket ban. The court framed three issues: whether spraying chemical disinfectants, organic disinfectants, or exposure to ultraviolet rays without approval violates Article 21. The court held that such practices without scientific backing and approval from the relevant ministry violate the right to health under Article 21. The court directed that no person or authority shall spray or fumigate any chemical or organic disinfectant on human beings or expose them to ultraviolet rays without prior approval from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. The court also directed the Union of India to issue appropriate directions to all States and Union Territories to ensure compliance.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Health - Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Spraying of Disinfectants on Humans - The court considered whether spraying or fumigation of chemical or organic disinfectants on human beings without approval of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare violates Article 21. Held that such practices without scientific backing and approval are violative of the right to health under Article 21 (Paras 18-20).

B) Public Health - Disinfection Tunnels - COVID-19 - Advisory dated 18.04.2020 - The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare had issued an advisory against spraying disinfectants on people. Despite this, various bodies installed disinfection tunnels. The court directed strict compliance with the advisory and banned such practices unless approved (Paras 3, 10, 20).

C) Environmental Law - Ultraviolet Rays - Human Exposure - Article 21 - The court also examined whether exposure of human beings to artificial ultraviolet rays for disinfection is violative of Article 21. Held that such exposure without regulatory approval is harmful and violates the right to health (Paras 18, 20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether spraying or fumigation of chemical/organic disinfectants on human beings or exposure to ultraviolet rays without approval of relevant ministry violates Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court held that spraying or fumigation of chemical or organic disinfectants on human beings or exposure to ultraviolet rays without approval from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare violates Article 21. The court directed that no person or authority shall spray or fumigate any disinfectant on human beings or expose them to ultraviolet rays without prior approval. The Union of India was directed to issue appropriate directions to all States and Union Territories to ensure compliance with the advisory and this order.

Law Points

  • Right to health under Article 21
  • Public interest litigation
  • Disinfection guidelines
  • Ultra vires action
  • Precautionary principle
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (SC) (11) 11

Writ Petition (C) No.560 of 2020

2020-11-05

Ashok Bhushan

Gurusimran Singh Narula

Union of India & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public interest litigation under Article 32 seeking ban on spraying disinfectants on humans.

Remedy Sought

Ban on usage, installation, production, advertisement of disinfection tunnels involving spraying or fumigation of chemical/organic disinfectants or exposure to ultraviolet rays for disinfecting humans.

Filing Reason

Despite advisory against spraying disinfectants on humans, various organizations were using disinfection tunnels, which are harmful and not approved by health authorities.

Previous Decisions

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare issued advisory dated 18.04.2020 against spraying disinfectants on people; meeting dated 09.06.2020 reiterated that spraying disinfectants is not recommended; O.M. dated 23.09.2020 directed States/UTs to ensure such practices are not implemented.

Issues

Whether spraying or fumigation of chemical disinfectants on human beings without approval violates Article 21. Whether spraying or fumigation of organic disinfectants on human beings without approval violates Article 21. Whether exposure of human beings to artificial ultraviolet rays violates Article 21.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: No credible health agency states human disinfection tunnels are effective; they are harmful and violate right to health under Article 21. Respondent: Union of India had not issued any advisory for such tunnels; advisory dated 18.04.2020 and meeting dated 09.06.2020 recommend against spraying; States/UTs must implement guidelines. Intervenor: Product uses natural oils, not chemicals; opposes blanket ban.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to health under Article 21 of the Constitution prohibits the spraying or fumigation of disinfectants on human beings or exposure to ultraviolet rays without scientific backing and approval from the relevant ministry, as such practices are harmful and not recommended by health authorities.

Judgment Excerpts

Article 21 of the Constitution provides for protection of life and personal liberty. Right to health is also recognized as an important facet of Article 21 of the Constitution. Spraying disinfectants is not recommended in both health care and non-health care settings.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed on 05.06.2020 under Article 32. Notice issued on 10.08.2020. Counter affidavit filed on 01.09.2020. Order passed on 07.09.2020 noting Union's submission to issue directions. Compliance affidavit filed on 28.09.2020 with O.M. dated 23.09.2020. Intervention application filed by Ideal Flow Pvt. Ltd. Final hearing and judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21, Article 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Bans Unauthorized Disinfection Tunnels on Humans in COVID-19 Public Interest Litigation. Right to Health Under Article 21 Violated by Spraying of Disinfectants Without Ministry Approval.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Acid Attack Murder Case. No Special Reasons for Death Penalty as Crime Not 'Rarest of Rare' Under Section 302 IPC.