Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for setting deceased ablaze set aside as dying declaration was not recorded in proper form and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 20
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of the appellant, Sharifabi, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Shayedabi by pouring kerosene and setting her ablaze. The incident occurred on 14.8.2010 at about 2.00 p.m. following a quarrel. The deceased succumbed to burn injuries during treatment. The trial court convicted the appellant based primarily on the dying declaration of the deceased. The appellant challenged the conviction on the ground that the dying declaration was unreliable and not properly recorded. The High Court examined the dying declaration and found that it was not recorded in the proper form as required by law, and there was no corroboration from independent witnesses. The court also noted that the prosecution failed to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction, and acquitted the appellant.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The appellant was convicted for murder based on a dying declaration. The court held that the dying declaration was not recorded in the proper form as required by law and there was no corroboration from independent witnesses. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. Held that the conviction was unsustainable and the appellant was entitled to acquittal. (Paras 1-10)

B) Evidence Law - Dying Declaration - Reliability - The court examined the dying declaration and found that it was not recorded in the presence of a magistrate and there was no certificate of fitness of the declarant. The court also noted that the dying declaration was not corroborated by any other evidence. Held that an unreliable dying declaration cannot form the sole basis for conviction. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code based on the dying declaration of the deceased is sustainable in law

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellant acquitted of all charges. Fine, if paid, to be refunded.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration must be recorded in proper form and must be free from tutoring
  • conviction cannot be based solely on an unreliable dying declaration without corroboration
  • benefit of doubt must be given to accused when prosecution fails to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (10) 176

Criminal Appeal No.550 of 2011

2012-10-30

P.V. Hardas, A.P. Bhangale

Mr. R.M. Daga for Appellant, Mr. R.S. Nayak for Respondent/State

Sharifabi w/o. Sabirshah

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder based on dying declaration which she claimed was unreliable

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment

Issues

Whether the dying declaration was reliable and could form the sole basis for conviction Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declaration was not recorded in proper form and was unreliable State argued that the dying declaration was credible and sufficient for conviction

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration must be recorded in proper form and must be free from tutoring; if it is unreliable and uncorroborated, it cannot form the sole basis for conviction. The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 14th October, 2011 passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Sessions Trial No.31 of 2011 whereby the appellant/accused herein was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. We have heard Mr.R.M.Daga, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr.R.M.Nayak, learned A.P.P. for respondent/State.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati on 14.10.2011 in Sessions Trial No.31 of 2011 for murder under Section 302 IPC. She appealed to the High Court. The High Court heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 30.10.2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 307
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for setting deceased ablaze set aside as dying declaration was not recorded in proper form and prosecution failed to prove guilt be...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Freedom Fighter's Pension Claim Under Swatantra Sainik Sanman Pension Scheme 1980 for Goa Liberation Movement Phase II Participants. The court held that the cut-off date of 1/08/2002 for pension eligibility was arbitrary and ...