Search Results for "leave to defend"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes City Civil Court Judgment: Petitioner Granted Summary Judgment. The court ruled in favor of M/s Mobile Arts S.A.L., granting a decree for recovery of dues, while dismissing the defendant's unconditional leave to defend.

The Bombay High Court quashed a trial court's judgment that had granted the respondent unconditional leave to defend a summary suit. The petitioner, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Upholding Eviction: Court Rules in Favor of Landlord Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act" "Conclusive Evidence in Written Agreements Seals Eviction; Jurisdictional and Procedural Claims Dismissed"

The case involves the eviction proceedings under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, based on Leave and License Agreements between t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous After Final Decree in Suit. Supreme Court dismisses appeal against High Court order due to subsequent final decree in the suit, rendering the appeal moot.

Civil Appeal arises from the Order passed by the High Court of Karnataka on 21st March 2022 in Writ Petition No. 10975 of 2020 (GM-CPC). The High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Summary Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC Due to Absence of Triable Issues. Leave to Defend Rightly Denied as Invoices Constituted Written Contracts Establishing Appellant's Liability for Goods Supplied.

The appeal arose from a summary suit for money recovery filed under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the plaintiff-respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Will Dispute Case — High Court Erred in Interfering with Concurrent Findings of Fact. Will Execution Proved Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 65(c) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a dispute over the validity of a Will dated 30.04.1980 executed by Chandu Ram in favor of his grandsons (sons of defendant No.5 Soha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR for Forgery and Cheating, Restores NI Act Complaint — Civil Suit Pending on Same Receipts Makes Criminal Proceedings Abuse of Process

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had declined to quash an FIR for forgery and cheating but h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 13-B of East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for NRI Landlords in Chandigarh and Punjab. Constitutional validity of provision granting immediate possession to Non-Resident Indians upheld as reasonable classification under Article 14.

The appeals were filed by tenants challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...