Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in IBC Case Due to Limitation Issues. The appeal was filed beyond the statutory limitation period of 60 days as prescribed under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Civil Appeal arose from a judgment dated 02.08.2023, passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (INS) No. 346 of 2021 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellant, the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, challenged the NCLAT's confirmation of a Resolution Plan approved by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on 13.08.2021, which allowed a significantly reduced payment towards excise arrears. The corporate debtor, M/s Samyu Glass Private Limited, had ceased manufacturing activities around late 2016 and was undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated by a financial creditor. The appellant raised a preliminary objection regarding the limitation period for filing the appeal, asserting that the appeal was filed late. The appellant contended that the limitation period should start from the date of receipt of the NCLAT order, while the respondent argued it began from the date of the order itself. The court analyzed the statutory provisions under the IBC and the Limitation Act, 1963, concluding that the appeal was indeed filed beyond the permissible time frame. The court emphasized that the limitation period is strict and cannot be extended beyond the statutory limits set by the IBC. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation, with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Limitation Period for Appeals - Appeal Barred by Limitation - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 62 - The court held that the appeal was filed beyond the statutory limitation period of 60 days as prescribed under Section 62 of the IBC, thus dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation. (Paras 18-18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal filed by the appellant was within the prescribed limitation period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation, stating that it was filed beyond the statutory period of 60 days as prescribed under Section 62 of the IBC.

Law Points

  • Limitation period
  • Condonable period
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Appeals under IBC
  • Statutory remedies
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (SC) (10) 55

Civil Appeal No. 7882 of 2023

2026-10-14

S.V.N. Bhatti, N. V. Anjaria

2026 INSC 1121

Saurav Roy, Ritin Rai

The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST Division

Sreenivasa Rao Ravinuthala and another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal challenging the confirmation of a Resolution Plan under the IBC.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to overturn the NCLAT's confirmation of the Resolution Plan.

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed due to the appellant's objection to the limitation period calculation.

Previous Decisions

The NCLAT had confirmed the Resolution Plan approved by the NCLT.

Issues

Whether the appeal was filed within the limitation period under the IBC. Interpretation of the starting point for the limitation period under Section 62 of the IBC.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the limitation period should start from the date of receipt of the order. The respondent contended that the limitation period begins from the date of the order itself.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the limitation period under Section 62 of the IBC is strict and cannot be extended beyond the statutory limits, emphasizing that the appeal was filed beyond the permissible time frame.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal stands dismissed as barred by limitation. The limitation period commences on the date the NCLAT pronounces the Order for an Appeal to this Court under Section 62 of the IBC.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed on 21.11.2023 against the NCLAT's order dated 02.08.2023, with a preliminary objection raised regarding limitation.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 62, Section 238-A
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Section 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholding High Court's Decision on Share Entitlement and Appellate Jurisdiction. The court held that in a partition suit, parties' positions are interchangeable, allowing appellate relief to non-appea...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Admits Central Excise Appeal on Conditional Exemption and Cenvat Credit. The Appeal Raises Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Notification No.6/2006-C.E. and Credit on Aggregates Used in Export.