Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Rozandari Kamgars Under NREGA — Termination Orders Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act. Daily wage workers under NREGA are entitled to protections under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and termination without notice and compensation is illegal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 82
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Akhil Bharatiya Ashanghathit Rozandari Kamgar Sanghathana, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the termination of services of daily wage workers (Rozandari Kamgars) engaged under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGA) in Aurangabad district. The workers were employed by the respondents (State of Maharashtra and its officers) on a daily wage basis under the scheme. Their services were terminated without any prior notice or hearing, and without payment of retrenchment compensation. The petitioner contended that the termination violated the principles of natural justice and the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which mandates notice and compensation before retrenchment. The respondents argued that the workers were engaged under a scheme and were not regular employees, and thus the protections of the Industrial Disputes Act did not apply. The court analyzed the facts and legal provisions, noting that the workers had been in continuous service for more than 240 days and were entitled to the protections under Section 25F. The court held that the termination without notice or hearing was in gross violation of natural justice and the Industrial Disputes Act. The court set aside the termination orders and directed the respondents to reinstate the workers with continuity of service and back wages at 50% from the date of termination till reinstatement. The court also directed the respondents to comply with Section 25F if any future retrenchment is contemplated.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination of Daily Wage Workers - Natural Justice - Termination of Rozandari Kamgars under NREGA without notice or hearing violates principles of natural justice - Held that even daily wage workers are entitled to a hearing before termination (Paras 5-6).

B) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 25F - Retrenchment Compensation - Termination of workers without payment of retrenchment compensation as required under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal - Held that the provisions of Section 25F apply to daily wage workers who have completed 240 days of continuous service (Paras 7-8).

C) NREGA - Rozandari Kamgars - Status - Workers engaged under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme are entitled to the protections of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Held that the scheme does not exclude the applicability of labour welfare legislation (Para 9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of services of daily wage workers (Rozandari Kamgars) engaged under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme without complying with the principles of natural justice and without payment of retrenchment compensation under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the termination orders, directed reinstatement of the workers with continuity of service and back wages at 50% from the date of termination till reinstatement, and directed compliance with Section 25F for any future retrenchment.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • termination without notice
  • Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • NREGA Scheme
  • daily wage workers
  • retrenchment compensation
  • reinstatement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (10) 14

Writ Petition No. 4207 of 2011

2012-10-16

R.M. Borde, S.S. Shinde

Mr. S.R. Bobade for petitioner, Mr. K.B. Choudhari, A.G.P. for Resp Nos. 1 to 3

Akhil Bharatiya Ashanghathit Rozandari Kamgar Sanghathana (Reg.No.MWB2203/06) Through its President Ankush M. Pawar

1. The State of Maharashtra, Through The Secretary, The Ministry of Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The State Rural Employment Guarantee Commissioner/Member Secretary of the S.E.G.C. 3. The District Programme Coordinator Cum District Collector, Aurangabad. 4. The Programme Officer, Rural Employment Guarantee Officers. 5. The Joint Programme Officers Rural Employment Guarantee Officers.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging termination of daily wage workers under NREGA.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of termination orders and reinstatement with back wages.

Filing Reason

Termination of services of Rozandari Kamgars without notice, hearing, or retrenchment compensation.

Issues

Whether termination of daily wage workers under NREGA without notice or hearing violates natural justice. Whether Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act applies to daily wage workers under NREGA.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that termination without notice or hearing and without payment of retrenchment compensation is illegal. Respondents argued that workers were engaged under a scheme and not regular employees, so Industrial Disputes Act does not apply.

Ratio Decidendi

Daily wage workers under NREGA are entitled to protections under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, including Section 25F. Termination without notice, hearing, or retrenchment compensation is illegal and violative of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The termination of services of the petitioners without complying with the principles of natural justice and without payment of retrenchment compensation as required under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal. Even daily wage workers are entitled to a hearing before termination.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2011 challenging termination orders. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 16th October 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Section 25F
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Rozandari Kamgars Under NREGA — Termination Orders Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act. Daily wage workers under...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Against Removal Under Section 39 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Upholds Minister's Order Confirming Removal for Misappropriation of Funds. Court holds that the Sarpanch's failure to deposit co...