Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Appointment of Hearing-Impaired Person as Sweeper in Municipal Corporation. Mandamus issued to consider petitioner's case for appointment from handicapped category under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 95
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Suresh Ramchandra Gunde, a 24-year-old hearing-impaired person, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. He sought a mandamus directing Respondents No. 1 to 4, including the State of Maharashtra and the Nanded-Waghala City Municipal Corporation, to consider his case for appointment to the post of sweeper from the handicapped category. The petitioner claimed that despite being physically fit with excellent eyesight, he suffers from hundred per cent hearing impairment. He had passed the Higher Secondary Certificate examination and possessed proficiency in English, Marathi, and Hindi typing, as well as certificates in MS-CIT and DTP in computer. On 2.6.2009, Respondent No. 4 issued an advertisement for the post of sweeper, and the petitioner applied under the handicapped category. However, his candidature was not considered. The court, after hearing the parties, allowed the petition and directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for appointment to the post of sweeper in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. The court did not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's claim for appointment.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226 of Constitution of India - Mandamus for Consideration of Appointment - Petitioner, a deaf person, sought mandamus to respondents for consideration of his case for appointment as sweeper from handicapped category - Court held that the petitioner's case must be considered for appointment in accordance with law, as he is a person with disability and entitled to reservation under the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, a person with hundred per cent hearing impairment, is entitled to be considered for appointment to the post of sweeper in the Municipal Corporation from the handicapped category.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute. The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's case for appointment to the post of sweeper in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
  • Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities
  • Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act
  • 1995
  • Reservation for handicapped
  • Mandamus for consideration of appointment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (05) 1

Writ Petition No. 410 of 2012

2012-05-11

A.S. Oka, Sunil P. Deshmukh

Shri Vitthal G. Salgare for Petitioner, Shri V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 to 7, Shri M.V. Deshpande for Respondent No. 4

Suresh s/o Ramchandra Gunde

The State of Maharashtra, The Commissioner, Handicapped, The Director of Health Services, The Commissioner, Nanded-Waghala City Municipal Corporation, The President, Medical Board, The Civil Surgeon, The District Collector, Nanded

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking mandamus for consideration of appointment to the post of sweeper from handicapped category.

Remedy Sought

Mandamus to Respondents No. 1 to 4 to consider petitioner's case for appointment to the post of sweeper in Respondent No. 4 Municipal Corporation from the handicapped category.

Filing Reason

Petitioner, a person with hundred per cent hearing impairment, applied for the post of sweeper under handicapped category but his candidature was not considered.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to be considered for appointment to the post of sweeper from the handicapped category.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he is physically fit, has excellent eyesight, and possesses necessary qualifications including HSC, typing skills, and computer certificates. Respondents opposed the petition, but the court did not detail their arguments.

Ratio Decidendi

A person with disability is entitled to be considered for appointment in accordance with law, and the court can issue mandamus under Article 226 to direct consideration of such case.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has approached this Court invoking powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus to Respondents No. 1 to 4 for consideration of his case for appointment to the post of sweeper in Respondent No.4-Municipal Corporation from the handicapped category, being a person with impaired hearing. The petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute. The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's case for appointment to the post of sweeper in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of the order.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 410 of 2012 before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. Rule was issued and made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, the petition was heard finally. Judgment was reserved on 03.05.2012 and pronounced on 11.05.2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Grant Case: Upholds Resumption of Granted Land Under Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act, 1978 Despite Delay. The court held that the absence of a limitation period in the Act and the welfare nature of the legislation al...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Shipping Company Tax Case — Reimbursement of Telecommunication Costs Held as Income. Payments received by foreign shipping company from Indian agents for use of MaerskNet system treated as revenue receip...