Bombay High Court Holds Telecommunication Service Constitutes 'Commerce' Under Bombay Sales Tax Act — Incidental Sale of Scrap Taxable. The court interpreted Section 2(5A) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 to include telecommunication services as 'commerce', making the appellant a 'dealer' liable for tax on scrap sales.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 108
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves Sales Tax References under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, concerning the tax liability of M/s. Bombay Telephone (now Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited) for the period from 1 April 1976 to 31 March 1984. The appellant, originally a department of the Central Government (later a corporation from 1 April 1986), is engaged in providing telecommunication facilities in India and abroad. While providing these services, it occasionally sold old telephones, directories, and discarded materials not required by it. Neither the main activity of providing telecommunication services nor the incidental activity of selling scrap materials were considered business activities, and the appellant was not registered as a dealer under the BST Act. With the introduction of clause (5A) to Section 2 of the BST Act with effect from 15 January 1975, which expanded the definition of 'business' to include any trade, commerce, or manufacture, the Sales Tax Officer opined that the appellant's activities constituted business and that the appellant was a dealer liable to tax on the sale of scrap. The Tribunal upheld this view. The common questions of law referred were whether the activity of rendering telecommunication service constitutes 'commerce' within the meaning of 'business' under Section 2(5A), and whether the appellant is a 'dealer' carrying on business of buying or selling goods, making its sales of scrap liable to tax. The High Court held that telecommunication service is a commercial activity and falls within the definition of 'commerce' under Section 2(5A), and consequently, the appellant is a 'dealer' under Section 2(11) and the incidental sale of scrap is taxable. The court answered both questions in the affirmative, against the appellant and in favor of the Revenue.

Headnote

A) Sales Tax - Definition of Business - Commerce - Section 2(5A) Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Whether telecommunication service constitutes 'commerce' - The court examined the meaning of 'commerce' in the context of the definition of 'business' and held that providing telecommunication services for a fee is a commercial activity and falls within the ambit of 'commerce' as used in Section 2(5A). The activity involves exchange of services for consideration and is systematic and organized. (Paras 1-5)

B) Sales Tax - Dealer - Incidental Sale of Scrap - Sections 2(5A) and 2(11) Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Whether the appellant is a 'dealer' liable to tax on sale of scrap - The court held that since the main activity of telecommunication is 'business', the incidental sale of scrap materials (old telephones, directories, discarded materials) is also part of the business activity. Therefore, the appellant is a 'dealer' under Section 2(11) and the sales of scrap are taxable. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether rendering telecommunication service constitutes 'commerce' within the definition of 'business' under Section 2(5A) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, and whether the appellant is a 'dealer' liable to tax on sale of scrap materials.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court answered both questions in the affirmative, holding that the appellant's activity of rendering telecommunication service constitutes 'commerce' under Section 2(5A) and that the appellant is a 'dealer' under Section 2(11), making its sales of scrap liable to tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

Law Points

  • Definition of business includes commerce
  • Telecommunication service is commerce
  • Incidental sale of scrap is business activity
  • Dealer definition includes government departments engaged in commerce
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012:BHC-OS:6556-DB

Sales Tax Reference No.23 of 2008, 24 of 2008, 25 of 2008, 27 of 2008, 28 of 2008, 29 of 2008, 30 of 2008

2012-04-27

J.P. Devadhar, M.S. Sanklecha

2012:BHC-OS:6556-DB

Mr. P V Surte with Mr. S P Surte for the appellant, Mr. B B Sharma, Additional Government Pleader for the respondent

M/s. Bombay Telephone (now Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited)

The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, Mumbai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Sales Tax Reference under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought a ruling that its telecommunication activity is not 'commerce' and that it is not a 'dealer' liable to tax on scrap sales.

Filing Reason

The Sales Tax Officer and Tribunal held that the appellant's telecommunication service constitutes 'commerce' and that the appellant is a 'dealer' liable to tax on sale of scrap materials.

Previous Decisions

The Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal upheld the assessment, leading to these references.

Issues

Whether rendering telecommunication service constitutes 'commerce' within the definition of 'business' under Section 2(5A) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Whether the appellant is a 'dealer' under Section 2(11) of the Act and liable to tax on sale of scrap materials.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that telecommunication service is not 'commerce' as it is a sovereign function and not carried on for profit. Respondent argued that telecommunication service is a commercial activity involving exchange for consideration and falls within 'commerce'.

Ratio Decidendi

The term 'commerce' in Section 2(5A) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 includes any activity of exchange of goods or services for consideration, and telecommunication services provided for a fee are commercial in nature. Consequently, the incidental sale of scrap by a person engaged in commerce is part of the business activity, making the person a 'dealer' liable to tax.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on true and correct interpretation of the provisions of Section 2(5A) of the Bombay Act as obtaining during the relevant assessment periods, the Tribunal was legally justified in holding that the applicant’s activity of rendering telecommunication service constitutes a 'Commerce' within the meaning of the term in the definition of 'business' in the said section 2(5A) and that therefore the said activity constitutes ‘business’ for the purpose of the Bombay Act ?

Procedural History

The Sales Tax Officer assessed the appellant to tax on scrap sales. The appellant appealed to the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal, which upheld the assessment. The appellant then sought a reference to the High Court, resulting in these Sales Tax References.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959: 2(5A), 2(11)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Holds Telecommunication Service Constitutes 'Commerce' Under Bombay Sales Tax Act — Incidental Sale of Scrap Taxable. The court interpreted Section 2(5A) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 to include telecommunication services as '...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Deposited Amount in Summary Suit for Recovery of Debt. Plaintiff entitled to withdraw amount deposited by defendant as condition for leave to defend, subject to furnishing security.