Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Credit Society Challenging Collector's Order Imposing Stamp Duty on Transfer Under Section 100 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Transfer Under Section 100 Is Not a Sale or Conveyance, Hence Article 25 of Bombay Stamps Act Not Attracted.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, a credit society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, obtained a Recovery Certificate under Section 101 of the Act against a borrower. In execution, the borrower's property was attached, and on 26th October 2009, the Assistant Registrar of Cooperative Societies passed an order under Section 100 read with Rule 85(5) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961, transferring the attached property to the petitioner. Subsequently, on 9th November 2011, the Collector, Satara, passed an order purportedly under Section 100, directing the Assistant Registrar to execute a registered document of transfer and recover stamp duty under Article 25 of the Bombay Stamps Act, 1958, based on the market value of the property or the amount due under the Recovery Certificate, whichever was higher. The petitioner challenged this order. The petitioner argued that a transfer under Section 100 does not amount to a sale or conveyance, relying on the decision in Balkisan Manekchand Zaver v. Jalgaon People's Cooperative Bank Ltd., and that the Collector had no power to impose stamp duty under Section 100. The respondent argued that the transfer effectively constitutes a sale. The court examined Section 100 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, which provides for transfer of property that cannot be sold, and noted that the transferee holds the property as a trustee. The court held that such a transfer is not a sale or conveyance and does not attract Article 25 of the Bombay Stamps Act. The Collector's order was quashed and set aside, and the petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies Act - Transfer of Property - Section 100 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Stamp Duty - The transfer of property under Section 100 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 does not amount to a sale or conveyance; therefore, Article 25 of Schedule I of the Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 is not attracted. The Collector has no power under Section 100 to direct payment of stamp duty. The transferee holds the property as a trustee. (Paras 3-8)

B) Stamp Act - Conveyance - Article 25 Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 - Applicability - Article 25 of the Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 applies only to a 'conveyance' as defined in the Act. A transfer under Section 100 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 is not a conveyance but a statutory transfer in execution of a recovery certificate, and hence no stamp duty is leviable. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a transfer of property under Section 100 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 amounts to a sale or conveyance attracting stamp duty under Article 25 of the Bombay Stamps Act, 1958, and whether the Collector has the power to direct payment of stamp duty under Section 100.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 9th November 2011 passed by the Collector, Satara, is quashed and set aside. The Writ Petition is allowed.

Law Points

  • Transfer under Section 100 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act is not a sale or conveyance
  • Article 25 of Bombay Stamps Act not attracted
  • Collector has no power to impose stamp duty under Section 100
  • Property held as trustee by credit society
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (10) 22

WRIT PETITION NO. 1883 OF 2011

2011-10-21

A.S. Oka, J

Shri A.J. Kenjale for the Petitioner, Mrs. P.S. Cardozo, AGP for the Respondents

Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit

Assistant Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Satara, and Another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging the order of the Collector, Satara, directing payment of stamp duty on transfer of property under Section 100 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the Collector's order dated 9th November 2011 and direction that no stamp duty is payable on the transfer under Section 100.

Filing Reason

The Collector directed the Assistant Registrar to execute a registered document of transfer and recover stamp duty under Article 25 of the Bombay Stamps Act, 1958, which the petitioner contended was not applicable.

Previous Decisions

The Assistant Registrar passed an order under Section 100 read with Rule 85(5) on 26th October 2009 transferring the attached property to the petitioner.

Issues

Whether a transfer under Section 100 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 amounts to a sale or conveyance attracting stamp duty under Article 25 of the Bombay Stamps Act, 1958. Whether the Collector has the power under Section 100 to direct payment of stamp duty.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that transfer under Section 100 is not a sale or conveyance, relying on Balkisan Manekchand Zaver v. Jalgaon People's Cooperative Bank Ltd., and that the Collector has no power to impose stamp duty under Section 100. Respondent argued that the transfer under Section 100 effectively amounts to a sale and therefore stamp duty is payable.

Ratio Decidendi

A transfer of property under Section 100 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 does not constitute a sale or conveyance; it is a statutory transfer in execution of a recovery certificate where the transferee holds the property as a trustee. Therefore, Article 25 of the Bombay Stamps Act, 1958, which applies to conveyances, is not attracted. The Collector has no authority under Section 100 to direct payment of stamp duty.

Judgment Excerpts

The transfer of the property in accordance with Section 100 of the said Act does not amount to a sale or conveyance and, therefore, Article 25 of Schedule I of the said Act of 1958 is not attracted. On the transfer under Section 100 of the said Act, the Petitioner will hold the property only as a Trustee.

Procedural History

The petitioner obtained a Recovery Certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The property was attached, and on 26th October 2009, the Assistant Registrar passed an order under Section 100 read with Rule 85(5) transferring the property to the petitioner. On 9th November 2011, the Collector passed an order directing execution of a registered document and recovery of stamp duty under Article 25 of the Bombay Stamps Act, 1958. The petitioner filed the present Writ Petition challenging the Collector's order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: 100, 101
  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961: 85(5)
  • Bombay Stamps Act, 1958: Article 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Family Court Order Directing Husband to Vacate Matrimonial Home in Favor of Wife Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Joint Ownership Does Not Bar Wife's Right to Residence.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Credit Society Challenging Collector's Order Imposing Stamp Duty on Transfer Under Section 100 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Transfer Under Section 100 Is Not a Sale or Conveyance, Hence Article 25 of ...