Supreme Court Restores Workmen's Compensation for Deceased Helper, Criticizes Insurer for Dragging Poor Family into Litigation. Employer's admission of wages is binding; interest under Section 4-A of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 is payable from date of accident.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, parents of a deceased workman, filed a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, for the death of their son who worked as a helper in a truck. The accident occurred on 30 October 2004 when the truck driver lost control and hit the helper, who died on 1 November 2004. The Commissioner awarded compensation of Rs. 2,64,895 with 12% interest from the date of accident, based on a monthly wage of Rs. 2,425 (including Rs. 25 daily food expense). The High Court reduced the compensation to Rs. 1,98,807.70 by taking minimum wage of Rs. 910 and reduced interest to 8% from the date of award, holding that there was no material to prove the salary and that interest is not payable from the accident date. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the employer had admitted the salary of Rs. 2,400 per month, and there was no reason to disbelieve it. The Court clarified that the food expense of Rs. 25 per day is excluded from wages under Section 2(m) as a special expense. Thus, the correct compensation is (50% of 2400) x 218.47 = Rs. 2,62,164 with 12% interest from the date of accident till realization, following the precedent in North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation v. Sujatha. The Court criticized the insurer for dragging the poor family into litigation over a paltry sum and awarded Rs. 1 lakh as costs.

Headnote

A) Workmen's Compensation - Wages - Definition - Section 2(m) Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Food expense paid by employer is a special expense excluded from wages - The Commissioner erred in including Rs. 25 daily food expense as wages; only Rs. 2400 per month salary is considered - Held that the High Court's reduction of wages to minimum wage was unjustified as employer admitted Rs. 2400 salary (Paras 6-9).

B) Workmen's Compensation - Interest - Section 4-A Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Interest payable from date of accident - The High Court erred in holding that interest is not payable from date of accident - Following North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation v. Sujatha, (2019) 11 SCC 514, interest at 12% per annum from date of accident is awarded (Paras 6, 9).

C) Workmen's Compensation - Computation - Section 4 Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Compensation for death - 50% of monthly wages multiplied by relevant factor - For deceased aged 24 years, relevant factor is 218.47 - Compensation computed as (50% of 2400) x 218.47 = Rs. 2,62,164 (Para 9).

D) Civil Procedure - Costs - Supreme Court awarded Rs. 1 lakh costs to appellants for being dragged into litigation by insurer over paltry sum - Held that insurer should not have challenged the award before High Court (Paras 7, 10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court was justified in reducing the compensation awarded by the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, by disregarding the employer's admission of wages and by denying interest from the date of accident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals allowed. High Court judgment set aside. Compensation restored to Rs. 2,62,164 (50% of Rs. 2400 x 218.47) with interest at 12% per annum from date of accident till realization. Appellants entitled to costs of Rs. 1 lakh. Commissioner to ensure payment within one month.

Law Points

  • Workmen's Compensation Act
  • 1923
  • Section 2(m) definition of wages
  • Section 4 computation of compensation
  • Section 4-A interest from date of accident
  • Employer's admission of wages binding on insurer
  • No justification for High Court to reduce wages without evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (12) 63

Civil Appeal Nos 7657-7658 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos 16316-16317 of 2019)

2021-12-11

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, A S Bopanna

For Appellant(s): Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria, AOR; For Respondent(s): Mr. Abhishek Gola, Adv., Mr. Viresh B. Saharya, AOR, Mr. Akshat Agrawal, Adv., Mr. Anshul Mehral, Adv.

Shantilata Sethy and Another

M/s Divisional Manager, The New India Assurance Company Limited and Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against High Court judgment reducing compensation under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought restoration of compensation awarded by Commissioner with interest from date of accident

Filing Reason

High Court reduced compensation from Rs. 2,64,895 to Rs. 1,98,807.70 and reduced interest from 12% to 8% from date of award

Previous Decisions

Commissioner awarded Rs. 2,64,895 with 12% interest from accident date; High Court reduced compensation and interest; Review dismissed

Issues

Whether the High Court erred in reducing the monthly wages from Rs. 2,400 to minimum wage of Rs. 910 Whether interest under Section 4-A is payable from the date of accident or from the date of award

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that employer admitted salary of Rs. 2,400 per month, and interest is governed by Section 4-A and payable from accident date as per North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation v. Sujatha Respondent insurer contended that there was no material to prove salary and interest is not payable from accident date

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 4-A of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, interest is payable from the date of accident, not from the date of award. The employer's admission of wages is binding and cannot be disregarded by the High Court without evidence to the contrary. Food expense paid as special expense is excluded from wages under Section 2(m).

Judgment Excerpts

The claim was not disputed by the employer. There was absolutely no basis for the High Court to reduce the award on the ground that there was no material to establish the salary that the deceased was earning at the time of the accident. When will a high and mighty state owned insurance company realize its social conscience? Our conscience has been deeply disturbed by the manner in which a farmer and his spouse have been left to the mercies of legal procedure. Therefore, the total compensation to be paid is as follows: (50% of 2400) x 218.47= Rs. 2,62,164. The first respondent is directed to pay Rs. 2,62,164 along with an interest of 12% from the date of accident till it is realised.

Procedural History

Appellants filed claim before Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (Case No. 273-D/2004). Commissioner awarded compensation on 29 February 2016. Insurer appealed to High Court in FAO No. 305 of 2016; High Court reduced compensation and interest on 30 November 2018. Review Petition No. 261 of 2018 dismissed on 1 February 2019. Appellants filed SLP before Supreme Court, which was converted into Civil Appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: Section 2(m), Section 4, Section 4-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Custody Dispute Over Minor Child After Mother's Death: Habeas Corpus Petition Dismissed in Favor of Maternal Relatives, Pending Further Legal Proceedings. The Supreme Court sets aside the Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision to transfer custody of a ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Workmen's Compensation for Deceased Helper, Criticizes Insurer for Dragging Poor Family into Litigation. Employer's admission of wages is binding; interest under Section 4-A of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 is payable from d...