Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Withdrawal of D.Ed. Course Recognition by NCTE. Show Cause Notice Not Served on Trust and Reply Not Considered, Violating Natural Justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 34
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, a public trust and its college of education, challenged an order dated 26/4/2011 by which the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) withdrew permission to run the D.Ed. course. The trust had applied for recognition with necessary documents including Form No.6 showing land in its name and an order for conversion to non-agriculture use. Recognition was granted on 14/26/3/2008. Subsequently, a show cause notice dated 4/6/2010 was issued alleging that the land was not in the trust's name. The trust submitted a reply, but the NCTE passed the impugned order without considering it and without serving the notice on the trust. The court found that the show cause notice was addressed to the college principal, not the trust, and the reply was not considered. The court held that the order violated principles of natural justice and was unsustainable. The petition was allowed, the impugned order quashed, and the matter remitted to NCTE for fresh consideration after giving the trust an opportunity of hearing.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Show Cause Notice - Opportunity of Hearing - National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - The respondent withdrew recognition without serving show cause notice on the petitioner trust and without considering its reply, violating principles of natural justice - Held that the order is unsustainable and set aside (Paras 5-7).

B) Education Law - Withdrawal of Recognition - D.Ed. Course - National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - The recognition was withdrawn on ground that land was not in name of trust, but the trust had submitted documents showing land in its name - Held that the respondent must reconsider the matter after giving opportunity of hearing (Paras 3-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order withdrawing recognition for D.Ed. course was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and without proper consideration of the petitioner's reply.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 26/4/2011 is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted to respondent no.1 for fresh consideration after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. Rule made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • show cause notice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • withdrawal of recognition
  • National Council for Teacher Education Act
  • 1993
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (08) 119

WRIT PETITION NO.2506 OF 2011

2011-08-02

R.M.SAVANT, J.

Mr. A.S.Chandurkar for petitioners, Mr. C.S.Kaptan for respondents

The G.S.Tompe Mahavidyalaya Sarvjanik Trust and The Late Sanjay Tompe and Late Sameer Deshmukh College of Education

National Council for Teacher Education through its Member Secretary and Regional Director

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India challenging order withdrawing recognition for D.Ed. course.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 26/4/2011 withdrawing permission to run D.Ed. course.

Filing Reason

The respondent NCTE withdrew recognition without serving show cause notice on the petitioner trust and without considering its reply.

Previous Decisions

Recognition granted on 14/26/3/2008; show cause notice dated 4/6/2010; impugned order dated 26/4/2011.

Issues

Whether the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice? Whether the respondent considered the petitioner's reply to the show cause notice?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that show cause notice was not served on the trust and their reply was not considered. Respondents argued that notice was served on the college principal and reply was considered.

Ratio Decidendi

An order withdrawing recognition must be passed after giving proper opportunity of hearing and considering the reply; failure to do so violates principles of natural justice and renders the order unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The above petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 26/4/2011, by which order the respondent no.1 herein has withdrawn permission to run the D.Ed. Course granted to the petitioner no.1 – Trust. In my view, the impugned order cannot be sustained in the eyes of law as the same has been passed in breach of the principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner trust applied for recognition to run D.Ed. course; recognition granted on 14/26/3/2008; show cause notice issued on 4/6/2010; impugned order withdrawing recognition passed on 26/4/2011; writ petition filed on 2/8/2011.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950:
  • National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Withdrawal of D.Ed. Course Recognition by NCTE. Show Cause Notice Not Served on Trust and Reply Not Considered, Violating Natural Justice.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Appointment of Commissioner in Final Decree Proceedings for Lack of Notice to Defendants. Order 26 Rule 9 CPC requires notice to all parties before appointing a commissioner for partition, and failure to do so vitiates...