Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Loan Repayment Disagreement Not Amounting to Criminal Offence Under Sections 406, 420 IPC. The Court held that the allegations did not disclose any criminal intent or dishonest inducement, and the matter was essentially a civil dispute regarding repayment of a loan.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 21
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Aashik Hasmukhbhai Patel, filed a Special Criminal Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR CR No. 11216026240003 of 2024 lodged on 24.02.2024 with the Cyber Crime Police Station, Gandhinagar Range. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The dispute arose from a loan transaction between the petitioner and the complainant. The petitioner contended that the allegations were purely civil in nature, as the loan was given and there was a disagreement over repayment, but no criminal intent or dishonest inducement was involved. The State opposed the quashing, arguing that the FIR disclosed a prima facie case. The Court analyzed the ingredients of Sections 406 and 420 IPC and found that the allegations did not satisfy the essential elements of criminal breach of trust or cheating. The Court noted that the dispute was essentially a civil matter regarding repayment of a loan, and no criminal offence was made out. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - Civil vs Criminal Dispute - Sections 406, 420 IPC - The petitioner sought quashing of FIR alleging criminal breach of trust and cheating in a loan transaction. The Court examined whether the dispute was purely civil in nature. Held that the allegations did not disclose any criminal intent or dishonest inducement, and the matter was essentially a civil dispute regarding repayment of a loan, hence the FIR was quashed. (Paras 1-5)

B) Criminal Procedure - Inherent Powers - Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Article 226 Constitution of India - The Court exercised its inherent powers to quash the FIR to prevent abuse of process of law. Held that where the dispute is civil in nature and no criminal offence is made out, the High Court can interfere under Article 226 and Section 528 BNSS. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the allegations in the FIR constitute the ingredients of criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC and cheating under Section 420 IPC, or whether the dispute is purely civil in nature warranting quashing of the FIR.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The FIR CR No. 11216026240003 of 2024 lodged on 24.02.2024 with the Cyber Crime Police Station, Gandhinagar Range, and all proceedings arising therefrom, are quashed and set aside qua the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Criminal breach of trust
  • Cheating
  • Ingredients of Section 406 IPC
  • Ingredients of Section 420 IPC
  • Civil dispute not criminal
  • Quashing of FIR
  • Inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS
  • Article 226 Constitution
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 428

R/Special Criminal Application (Quashing) No. 4861 of 2025

2026-03-11

M. R. Mengdey

Yatin S Oza (Senior Advocate), Anurag R Rathor, Prachi J Thakkar for Applicant; Maithili Mehta, APP for Respondent No. 1

Aashik Hasmukhbhai Patel

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal quashing petition under Article 226 and Section 528 BNSS

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR CR No. 11216026240003 of 2024 and all proceedings arising therefrom

Filing Reason

Allegations of criminal breach of trust and cheating in a loan transaction; petitioner contends dispute is civil

Issues

Whether the allegations in the FIR constitute the ingredients of criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC and cheating under Section 420 IPC? Whether the dispute is purely civil in nature warranting quashing of the FIR?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the dispute is purely civil in nature, arising from a loan transaction, and no criminal intent or dishonest inducement is involved. Respondent State argued that the FIR discloses a prima facie case of criminal breach of trust and cheating.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the allegations in an FIR do not disclose the essential ingredients of criminal breach of trust or cheating, and the dispute is essentially civil in nature, the High Court may exercise its inherent powers under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to quash the FIR to prevent abuse of process of law.

Judgment Excerpts

By filing the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: [A] ... [B] ... [C] ... [D] ... [E] ...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a Special Criminal Application under Article 226 and Section 528 BNSS seeking quashing of FIR CR No. 11216026240003 of 2024. The Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 11.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 406, 420
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Substitution Application in Revenue Revision. Delay of 2 years and 8 months not sufficiently explained; Tribunal's order upheld as just and proper.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Loan Repayment Disagreement Not Amounting to Criminal Offence Under Sections 406, 420 IPC. The Court held that the allegations did not disclose any criminal intent or ...