Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for Non-Prosecution. Court Holds That Dismissal in Default and Acquittal of Accused Without Considering Merits Is Not Sustainable When Complainant's Counsel Was Present.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Murlidhar s/o Harkisandas Manwani, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Sharangdhar s/o Ramlal Lohar, in Criminal Case No. 981 of 2006 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Raver. The complaint was dismissed in default on 25.08.2008, and the accused was acquitted. The applicant sought leave to appeal against this order. The High Court heard the parties and noted that the dismissal occurred despite the presence of the complainant's counsel. The court held that the Magistrate erred in dismissing the complaint in default when the counsel was present, as the counsel's presence should be considered as compliance with the requirement for prosecution. The court set aside the impugned order and restored the complaint to its original number, directing the Magistrate to proceed with the case in accordance with law. The application for leave to appeal was allowed, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Dismissal of Complaint in Default - Section 256 CrPC - Restoration of Complaint - The Magistrate dismissed the complaint in default and acquitted the accused despite the presence of the complainant's counsel - Held that the order was not sustainable as the counsel's presence should have been considered as compliance - The High Court set aside the order and restored the complaint to its original number (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dismissal of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in default and acquittal of the accused, when the complainant's counsel was present, is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the application for leave to appeal, set aside the order dated 25.08.2008, and restored the complaint to its original number. The Magistrate was directed to proceed with the case in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Dismissal of complaint in default
  • acquittal of accused without merits
  • restoration of complaint
  • Negotiable Instruments Act
  • 1881 Section 138
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • 1973 Section 256
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (04) 1

Criminal Application No. 4123 of 2008 with Criminal Appeal St. No. 821 of 2008

2011-04-27

Shrihari P. Davare

Mr. Milind Patil for applicant, Mr. P.N. Kutti for respondent

Murlidhar s/o. Harkisandas Manwani

Sharangdhar s/o. Ramlal Lohar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against dismissal of complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in default and acquittal of accused.

Remedy Sought

Leave to file appeal and setting aside of order dated 25.08.2008 dismissing complaint in default.

Filing Reason

The complaint was dismissed in default despite presence of complainant's counsel.

Previous Decisions

The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Raver dismissed the complaint in default and acquitted the accused on 25.08.2008.

Issues

Whether the dismissal of complaint in default and acquittal of accused is sustainable when complainant's counsel was present.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued that the Magistrate erred in dismissing the complaint in default despite the presence of his counsel.

Ratio Decidendi

The presence of the complainant's counsel at the hearing should be considered as compliance with the requirement for prosecution, and dismissal in default and acquittal without considering merits is not sustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the position that the complaint filed by the complainant has been dismissed in default and acquitting the respondent/original accused. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

Procedural History

The applicant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in Criminal Case No. 981 of 2006 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Raver. The Magistrate dismissed the complaint in default and acquitted the accused on 25.08.2008. The applicant then filed Criminal Application No. 4123 of 2008 seeking leave to appeal and Criminal Appeal St. No. 821 of 2008 challenging the order.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 256
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Strict Compliance Required for Reduced Penalty Under Section 11AC. The benefit of 25% penalty is available only if duty, interest and reduced penalty are paid within 30 days...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for Non-Prosecution. Court Holds That Dismissal in Default and Acquittal of Accused Without Considering Merits Is Not Sustainable Whe...