Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal for Murder in Dowry Death Case — Dying Declaration Found Unreliable Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistencies.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused for the offence of murder under Section 302 IPC. The respondent was originally charged with murder and cruelty. The Sessions Judge acquitted him of murder but convicted him under Section 498A IPC for cruelty, sentencing him to two years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The State appealed the acquittal. The High Court noted that the eyewitnesses did not support the prosecution case and turned hostile. The dying declaration recorded by a police constable was the main evidence, but the court found it unreliable due to lack of corroboration and inconsistencies. The court also noted that the accused was not available for hearing despite issuance of bailable warrant. After examining the record, the High Court found no perversity in the Sessions Judge's reasoning and dismissed the appeal, upholding the acquittal for murder.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Section 302 IPC - The court examined whether the dying declaration implicating the accused was reliable and sufficient to convict for murder. The dying declaration was recorded by a police constable and contained allegations of kerosene being poured and set on fire. However, the eyewitnesses turned hostile and the dying declaration was not corroborated by other evidence. The court held that the dying declaration was not reliable and the acquittal by the Sessions Judge was justified. (Paras 6-9)

B) Criminal Law - Cruelty by Husband - Section 498A IPC - The accused was convicted for cruelty under Section 498A IPC based on evidence of ill-treatment and harassment. The court noted that the accused did not challenge this conviction. (Paras 2, 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the acquittal of the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was justified in light of the dying declaration and other evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the acquittal of the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 498A IPC
  • Acquittal appeal
  • Unreliable dying declaration
  • Lack of corroboration
  • Inconsistencies in evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (10) 170

Criminal Appeal No. 68 of 1998

2010-10-15

A. H. Joshi, A. R. Joshi

Smt. B. P. Malduhre (Additional Public Prosecutor for appellant), None present for respondent

State of Maharashtra

Krushna S/o Raghunath Madavi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

State sought reversal of acquittal and conviction of respondent for murder.

Filing Reason

State aggrieved by acquittal of respondent for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Previous Decisions

Sessions Judge acquitted respondent for murder under Section 302 IPC but convicted under Section 498A IPC.

Issues

Whether the dying declaration was reliable and sufficient to convict for murder under Section 302 IPC. Whether the acquittal by the Sessions Judge was perverse or unreasonable.

Submissions/Arguments

State argued that the dying declaration clearly implicated the accused and should be relied upon. Respondent did not appear or present arguments.

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration must be reliable and corroborated by other evidence to sustain a conviction for murder. In this case, the dying declaration was not reliable as the eyewitnesses turned hostile and there were inconsistencies. The acquittal by the Sessions Judge was not perverse and did not warrant interference.

Judgment Excerpts

The eyewitnesses did not support the case of prosecution when the matter was put to trial. The dying declaration was recorded by Police Constable in which victim has alleged against her husband-accused, of pouring kerosene over her and setting her on fire.

Procedural History

The Sessions Judge, Chandrapur acquitted the respondent for murder under Section 302 IPC but convicted under Section 498A IPC on 12/11/1997. The State appealed to the High Court, which admitted the appeal on 07/03/1998 and directed action under Section 390 CrPC. The appeal was heard on 15/10/2010 and dismissed.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 498A
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 390
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal for Murder in Dowry Death Case — Dying Declaration Found Unreliable Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistencies.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced for Deceased's Dependents. Negligence of Driver and Insurer's Liability Affirmed Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.