Bombay High Court Upholds Circular Requiring Audit by Chartered Accountants or Certified Auditors in Cooperative Societies. Section 81(1)(a) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 empowers Registrar to prescribe auditor qualifications, and the circular is a valid general order.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a circular dated 11th November 1996 issued by the Government of Maharashtra under Section 81(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The circular required that the audit of cooperative societies be conducted only by Chartered Accountants or Certified Auditors. The first petition was filed by the Maharashtra Certified Auditors Association and a chartered accountant, while the second petition was filed by two credit cooperative societies of employees of Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited and Sudarshan Chemicals Limited. The petitioners argued that the circular was ultra vires the Act and that it restricted the class of auditors without authority. The court examined Section 81(1)(a), which empowers the Registrar to audit or cause to be audited the accounts of every society by a person authorised by him by general or special order. The court held that the circular was a valid exercise of this power, as the Registrar could prescribe qualifications for auditors. The petitions were dismissed, upholding the circular.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Audit of Cooperative Societies - Section 81(1)(a) Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Power of Registrar to prescribe qualifications - The circular dated 11-11-1996 requiring audit only by Chartered Accountants or Certified Auditors is valid as it is within the powers conferred by Section 81(1)(a) which allows the Registrar to authorise persons by general or special order. The circular does not exceed the statutory power and is not ultra vires. (Paras 1-3)

B) Cooperative Law - Audit of Cooperative Societies - Section 81(1)(a) Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Validity of circular - The petitioners challenged the circular on the ground that it restricts the class of auditors. The court held that the Registrar has the authority to specify qualifications and the circular is a reasonable exercise of that power. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the circular dated 11th November 1996 issued by the Government of Maharashtra under Section 81(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, requiring audit of cooperative societies to be conducted only by Chartered Accountants or Certified Auditors, is valid and within the powers of the Registrar.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions are dismissed. The circular dated 11th November 1996 is upheld as valid.

Law Points

  • Section 81(1)(a) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Audit of cooperative societies
  • Qualifications of auditors
  • Circular dated 11-11-1996
  • Validity of executive instructions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (10) 44

Writ Petition No.1206 of 1997 and Writ Petition No.3782 of 1997

2010-10-06

B.H. Marlapalle, U.D. Salvi

Mr.R.P. Sabban for the appellant, Mr.C.R. Sonawane, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 4

Maharashtra Certified Auditors Association (Regd.) and Shri. Dinesh A. Prabhu (in WP 1206/1997); Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited Employees Coop. Credit Society Ltd. and Sudarshan Chemical Kamgar Coop. Credit Society Ltd. (in WP 3782/1997)

The State of Maharashtra, The Commissioner for Cooperation and Registrar of Cooperative Societies, The Officer on Special Duty, Audit Board (ADF), The Dairy Development Commissioner

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the validity of a government circular regarding audit of cooperative societies.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the circular dated 11th November 1996 requiring audit only by Chartered Accountants or Certified Auditors.

Filing Reason

The circular was alleged to be ultra vires the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and beyond the powers of the Registrar.

Issues

Whether the circular dated 11-11-1996 is within the powers conferred by Section 81(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Whether the circular is ultra vires the Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the circular restricts the class of auditors without authority and is ultra vires the Act. Respondents argued that the circular is a valid exercise of power under Section 81(1)(a) which allows the Registrar to authorise persons by general or special order.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 81(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 empowers the Registrar to audit or cause to be audited the accounts of every society by a person authorised by him by general or special order. The circular requiring audit only by Chartered Accountants or Certified Auditors is a valid general order and within the powers of the Registrar.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 81(1) of the Act reads as under : “81. Audit. (1)(a) The Registrar shall audit, or cause to be audited, at least once in each cooperative year, by a person authorised by him by general or special order in writing in this behalf the accounts of every society which has been...” Both these petitions have a common challenge namely the validity of the circular dated 11th November 1996 issued by the Government of Maharashtra through the Department of Cooperation and Textiles in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 81(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

Procedural History

The petitions were filed in 1997 challenging the circular dated 11-11-1996. The court heard both petitions together and delivered judgment on 6th October 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: 81(1)(a)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Circular Requiring Audit by Chartered Accountants or Certified Auditors in Cooperative Societies. Section 81(1)(a) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 empowers Registrar to prescribe auditor qualifications, and th...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — No Willful Disobedience Found. Delay in Payment of Compensation Does Not Amount to Contempt Under Sections 11 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.