Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder by Burning Wife — Dying Declaration Found Credible. Life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC and three years under Section 498-A IPC confirmed.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Eknath s/o Bhagwan Hatkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon for the murder of his wife Anita under Section 302 IPC and for cruelty under Section 498-A IPC. The marriage had taken place 10-12 years prior. The accused suspected his wife's chastity and did not allow her to go for labour work, but due to poor financial condition, she continued working. On 13-8-2007, Anita went to the field for work despite her husband's objection. That night, while she was semi-asleep, the accused poured kerosene on her from a can and set her on fire. She came out shouting, and neighbours and in-laws extinguished the fire. She was taken to the hospital, where her statement was recorded by a police officer (PSI Jilha Peth) and treated as an FIR. Initially, offences under Sections 307 and 498-A IPC were registered. Anita died during treatment, and Section 302 IPC was added. The trial court convicted the appellant based on the dying declaration and other evidence. The High Court, in appeal, examined the credibility of the dying declaration. The court noted that the dying declaration was recorded when the victim was conscious, and it was corroborated by the medical evidence (burns consistent with pouring of kerosene) and the seizure of a plastic can, matchbox, and burnt clothes from the spot. The court also considered the motive of suspicion and demand of Rs.50,000/-. The court found no reason to disbelieve the dying declaration and held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were confirmed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder by Burning - Dying Declaration - Section 302, 498-A IPC, Section 32 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - The appellant-husband was convicted for pouring kerosene on his wife and setting her on fire, causing her death. The dying declaration recorded by a police officer when the victim was conscious was found credible and corroborated by medical evidence and other circumstances. The court held that the dying declaration is trustworthy and sufficient to sustain conviction for murder and cruelty. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Law - Cruelty by Husband - Section 498-A IPC - The appellant subjected his wife to cruelty by suspecting her chastity and preventing her from working. The evidence of the deceased's mother and the dying declaration established the cruelty. The court upheld the conviction under Section 498-A IPC. (Paras 2-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declaration of the deceased is reliable and sufficient to convict the appellant for murder under Section 302 IPC and cruelty under Section 498-A IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Sessions Case No. 199 of 2007 are confirmed.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration can be sole basis of conviction if found credible
  • Section 32 of Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder by burning
  • Conviction under Section 498-A IPC for cruelty by husband
  • Motive of suspicion of chastity and demand of money
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (08) 28

Criminal Appeal No. 733 of 2008

2010-08-13

S.B. Deshmukh, S.S. Shinde

Mr. C.V. Dharurkar (for appellant), Mr. V.D. Godbharle (A.P.P. for respondent)

Eknath s/o Bhagwan Hatkar

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and cruelty

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the judgment and order of conviction dated 16-10-2008 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Sessions Case No. 199 of 2007

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant for murder (life imprisonment) and cruelty (3 years RI) on 16-10-2008

Issues

Whether the dying declaration of the deceased is reliable and sufficient to convict the appellant for murder under Section 302 IPC? Whether the conviction under Section 498-A IPC for cruelty is sustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declaration is not reliable as it was recorded by a police officer and there were inconsistencies. Respondent/State argued that the dying declaration was recorded when the victim was conscious and is corroborated by medical and circumstantial evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration, if found to be credible and trustworthy, can be the sole basis for conviction without corroboration. In this case, the dying declaration of the deceased was recorded when she was conscious, and it was consistent with the medical evidence and other circumstances, establishing the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is filed challenging the final judgment and order dated 16-10-2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Sessions Case No. 199 of 2007, whereby the appellant / accused is convicted for the offence punishable under section 302 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- i/d to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year. The factual matrix of the prosecution case is as under : Deceased Anita Eknath Hatkar was the wife of accused Eknath. Their marriage was performed before 10 to 12 years ago. Anita Hatkar used to do labour work and was maintaining herself. Accused Eknath was suspecting chastity of his wife.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon on 16-10-2008 in Sessions Case No. 199 of 2007. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 733 of 2008 before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench). The appeal was reserved on 12-08-2010 and pronounced on 13-08-2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 498-A, 307
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder by Burning Wife — Dying Declaration Found Credible. Life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC and three years under Section 498-A IPC confirmed.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Trust's Challenge to Land Allotment Cancellation for Non-Compliance with Conditions. CIDCO's cancellation of land allotment for failure to develop garden and stadium as per terms upheld as valid exercise of contractual rig...