Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Insurer in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable for Gratuitous Passenger in Goods Vehicle. The court upheld the award of Rs. 19,500 with 12% interest for injuries sustained by a gratuitous passenger, as the policy covered third-party risks and the accident occurred during the validity period.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by New India Assurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 5th July 1995 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati in Claim Petition No. 41/1990. The Tribunal had held the appellant along with other non-applicants jointly and severally liable to pay compensation of Rs. 19,500 with interest at 12% per annum from the date of application till realization. The facts are that on 16th January 1990 at 1:30 p.m., the claimant, aged about 21 years and an agricultural labourer, was travelling from Sarul to Talegaon Dashasar in a heavy goods vehicle (truck) bearing Registration No. MCI 1043 insured with the appellant during the validity period from 17th February 1989 to 16th February 1990. The truck was owned by Pramod Babulal (Non-applicant No.2) and was proceeding from Amravati via Talegaon loaded with metal. The driver stopped the truck near Kharda Fata and allowed the claimant to travel towards Talegaon upon request. The non-applicant No.1 drove the truck negligently and at high speed, and while attempting to overtake a bicycle, lost control and turned turtle. The claimant, who was in the rear portion of the truck, sustained injuries on his head, chest, and backside, including a fracture to the 12th vertebra. He was taken to Irwin Hospital at Amravati and was an indoor patient for about 15 days, and thereafter underwent medical treatment under Dr. Phadke. The claimant sustained a fracture and cannot work as before the accident. Dr. Phadke issued a medical certificate Exh. 43 in support of the claim. The legal issue was whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation for injuries sustained by a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle. The court, after considering the facts and circumstances, dismissed the appeal and upheld the award, holding that the insurer is liable as the policy covered third-party risks and the accident occurred during the validity period.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Gratuitous Passenger - Liability of Insurer - The insurer is liable to pay compensation for injuries sustained by a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle, as the policy covers third-party risks and the accident occurred during the validity period. The court upheld the award of Rs. 19,500 with 12% interest per annum from the date of application till realization. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation for injuries sustained by a gratuitous passenger travelling in a goods vehicle at the time of accident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The judgment and award dated 5th July 1995 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati in Claim Petition No. 41/1990 is upheld. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Liability of insurer for gratuitous passenger in goods vehicle
  • Joint and several liability of owner and insurer
  • Compensation for personal injury in motor accident
  • Interest rate on compensation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (07) 160

First Appeal No. 284/1997

2010-07-05

A.P. Bhangale

Mr A J Pophaly for appellant, Mr O D Jain for Respondent No.1, Mr J T Gilda for Respondents 2 and 3

New India Assurance Company Limited

Shrikirshna s/o Laxman Jirepure, Pramod s/o Babulal Sahu, Vinod s/o Babulal Sahu

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation for personal injury sustained in a motor accident.

Remedy Sought

The appellant (insurer) sought to set aside the award of compensation of Rs. 19,500 with interest.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the liability to pay compensation for injuries sustained by a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati in Claim Petition No. 41/1990 held the appellant and other non-applicants jointly and severally liable to pay compensation of Rs. 19,500 with 12% interest per annum from the date of application till realization.

Issues

Whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation for injuries sustained by a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle.

Ratio Decidendi

The insurer is liable to pay compensation for injuries sustained by a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle, as the policy covers third-party risks and the accident occurred during the validity period.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is filed against the judgment and award dated 5th July,1995 passed by learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati in Claim Petition No. 41/1990, whereby the appellant along with other nonapplicants were held liable jointly and severally to pay compensation in the sum of Rs. 19,500/ along with interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of application till realization.

Procedural History

The claimant filed Claim Petition No. 41/1990 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati. The Tribunal passed judgment and award on 5th July 1995 holding the appellant and other non-applicants jointly and severally liable. The appellant filed First Appeal No. 284/1997 before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Nagpur, which was dismissed on 5th July 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Insurer in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable for Gratuitous Passenger in Goods Vehicle. The court upheld the award of Rs. 19,500 with 12% interest for injuries sustained by a gratuitous passenger, as the po...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Revision in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Prosecution Invalid.