Bombay High Court Allows Discharge in Criminal Revision for Offences Under SC/ST Act and IPC — No Prima Facie Case for Caste-Based Insult or Intentional Insult to Provoke Breach of Peace. The court held that the alleged abusive words were not caste-based and did not constitute intentional insult or criminal intimidation, leading to discharge of the accused.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Prof. Mansoor s/o Karimoddin Kadri, filed a Criminal Revision Application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order dated 01.02.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No.301/2009, rejecting his application for discharge. The applicant was the accused in the said sessions case, which arose from Crime No.15/2009 registered at Sillod police station on the complaint of respondent No.2, Vishnu s/o Gangaram Katkar. The complaint alleged that during a public speech, the applicant used indecent language against an elected candidate of the opposition party. When the complainant and his associates went to the Congress party office to ask why such words were used, the applicant allegedly abused the complainant, saying in Marathi: "Tu Mala Kay Shikvato Chamtya, Chamtyani Meleli Dhore Gavabaher Takavi Tyanchi fakta katadi kadhavi va tyachyavar pot bharave navarsevak." The police filed a charge sheet for offences under Sections 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The applicant sought discharge on the ground that the material on record did not make out a prima facie case. The learned Additional Sessions Judge rejected the application. In revision, the High Court examined the statements of witnesses recorded during investigation. The court noted that the complainant was not a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe, and the alleged abusive words were not uttered with reference to the complainant's caste. The court also found that the words did not constitute an intentional insult to provoke a breach of peace, nor did they amount to criminal intimidation. The court held that no prima facie case was made out for any of the offences. Consequently, the High Court allowed the revision application, set aside the impugned order, and discharged the applicant from the offences.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Discharge - Standard of Proof at Charge Stage - The court must consider whether a prima facie case exists; if the material does not disclose the essential ingredients of the offence, discharge is warranted. (Para 6)

B) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(x) - Caste-Based Insult - For an offence under Section 3(1)(x), the insult must be on account of the victim's caste. In the present case, the alleged abusive words were not uttered with reference to the complainant's caste but were general abuses, and the complainant himself was not a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe. Hence, no prima facie case under Section 3(1)(x) is made out. (Paras 6-7)

C) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 504 - Intentional Insult to Provoke Breach of Peace - The essential ingredient is that the insult must be such as to provoke the person insulted to commit a breach of the peace. The alleged words, though abusive, do not appear to be of such a nature as to provoke a breach of peace, and the complainant's subsequent conduct of going to the applicant's office suggests he was not provoked. Hence, no prima facie case under Section 504 IPC. (Para 7)

D) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 506 - Criminal Intimidation - The threat must be to cause injury to the person, reputation, or property. The alleged words do not constitute a threat of injury but are merely abusive. Hence, no prima facie case under Section 506 IPC. (Para 7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to be discharged from the offences under Sections 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, based on the material on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The revision application is allowed. The impugned order dated 01.02.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, below Exhibit 6 in Sessions Case No.301/2009 is set aside. The applicant is discharged from the offences under Sections 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Law Points

  • Discharge
  • Prima facie case
  • SC/ST Act
  • Section 3(1)(x)
  • Section 504 IPC
  • Section 506 IPC
  • Criminal Revision
  • Standard of proof at charge stage
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (07) 32

Criminal Revision Application No.128 of 2010

2010-07-29

A.V. Potdar, J.

Mr. Rahul Joshi for applicant, Mr. P.P. More APP for respondent No.1 State

Prof. Shri. Mansoor s/o Karimoddin Kadri

The State of Maharashtra and Vishnu s/o Gangaram Katkar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision application challenging rejection of discharge application in a sessions case for offences under SC/ST Act and IPC.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought discharge from the offences under Sections 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act and Sections 504, 506 IPC.

Filing Reason

The applicant was accused of using indecent language in a public speech and abusing the complainant when questioned.

Previous Decisions

The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, rejected the discharge application vide order dated 01.02.2010 in Sessions Case No.301/2009.

Issues

Whether the material on record makes out a prima facie case for the offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act? Whether the material on record makes out a prima facie case for the offences under Sections 504 and 506 IPC?

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued that the alleged abusive words were not uttered with reference to the complainant's caste and that the complainant was not a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe. The applicant argued that the words did not constitute intentional insult to provoke breach of peace or criminal intimidation.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act, the insult must be on account of the victim's caste. Since the complainant was not a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe and the abusive words were not caste-based, no prima facie case is made out. For Section 504 IPC, the insult must be such as to provoke a breach of peace; the alleged words do not meet that standard. For Section 506 IPC, the words must constitute a threat of injury; mere abuse is insufficient.

Judgment Excerpts

The complainant is not a member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe. The alleged abusive words are not uttered with reference to the caste of the complainant. The words alleged to have been uttered by the applicant do not constitute an intentional insult to provoke breach of peace. The words do not constitute criminal intimidation.

Procedural History

The offence was registered as CR No.15/2009 at Sillod police station. Charge sheet was filed for offences under Sections 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act and Sections 504, 506 IPC. The applicant filed a discharge application in Sessions Case No.301/2009, which was rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on 01.02.2010. The applicant then filed Criminal Revision Application No.128 of 2010 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, which was allowed on 29.07.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: 3(1)(x)
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 504, 506
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Married Daughter's Claim for Compassionate Appointment as Fair Price Shop Dealer. Exclusion of married daughter from definition of 'family' in G.O. No. 6 of 2019 held ultra vires the 2016 Order and unconstitutional under Articles...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Discharge in Criminal Revision for Offences Under SC/ST Act and IPC — No Prima Facie Case for Caste-Based Insult or Intentional Insult to Provoke Breach of Peace. The court held that the alleged abusive words were not caste...