Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased passenger was travelling in an auto-rickshaw which overturned due to rash driving; court found contributory negligence of the deceased and reduced insurer's liability by 50%.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, The New India Assurance Company Limited, challenged the judgment and award dated 30.12.2008 passed by the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati, whereby respondents no. 1 to 3 were held jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 4,75,000/- as compensation inclusive of no fault liability under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act with interest at 7.50% per annum from the date of petition till payment. The facts briefly are that deceased Vijaya, aged about 46 years, wife of claimant no. 1 and mother of claimant no. 2, while travelling on 1.6.2002 by an auto rickshaw no. MH27-C-3602 along with other passengers towards Nandgaon Khandeshwar, met with an accident when the auto rickshaw overturned due to rash and negligent driving. The claimants filed a petition for compensation. The Tribunal held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the auto rickshaw driver and awarded compensation of Rs. 4,75,000/-. The insurance company appealed contending that the deceased was also negligent as she boarded an overcrowded vehicle and that the compensation was excessive. The court considered the issue of contributory negligence and found that the deceased, by boarding an overcrowded auto rickshaw, contributed to the accident. The court apportioned liability equally between the driver and the deceased, reducing the compensation by 50%. The court also upheld the multiplier of 13 applied by the Tribunal as per the Second Schedule. The court directed that the insurance company shall pay 50% of the awarded amount with interest and costs, and the claimants shall bear the remaining 50% due to contributory negligence. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Contributory Negligence - Apportionment of Liability - Deceased passenger travelling in auto-rickshaw which overturned due to rash driving - Held that the deceased, by boarding an overcrowded vehicle, contributed to the accident - Liability apportioned equally between driver and deceased - Compensation reduced by 50% (Paras 5-7).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Quantum of Compensation - Multiplier - Deceased aged 46 years, housewife - Tribunal applied multiplier of 13 - Held that multiplier of 13 is correct as per Second Schedule to Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - No interference (Para 8).

C) Motor Accident Claims - No Fault Liability - Section 140 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Tribunal awarded Rs. 50,000 under no fault liability - Held that this amount is already included in total compensation and need not be separately deducted (Para 9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal erred in not considering contributory negligence of the deceased and in awarding excessive compensation?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The impugned award is modified. The insurance company shall pay 50% of the awarded amount of Rs. 4,75,000/- with interest at 7.50% per annum from the date of petition till payment. The claimants shall bear the remaining 50% due to contributory negligence. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Motor accident compensation
  • No fault liability
  • Section 140 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Apportionment of liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (06) 139

First Appeal No. 1388 of 2009

2010-06-30

A.P. Bhangale

Mr Gautam Chatterjee (for appellant), Mr Nilesh Gawande (for respondents 1 & 2), Mr W.G. Paunikar (for respondent no.3)

The New India Assurance Company Limited

Keshaorao Manikrao Mete, Nilesh Keshaorao Mete, M/s Aparna Associates

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Appellant insurance company sought reduction of compensation on grounds of contributory negligence and excessive quantum

Filing Reason

Challenge to award of Rs. 4,75,000/- as compensation for death of Vijaya in auto rickshaw accident

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati awarded Rs. 4,75,000/- with interest at 7.50% per annum

Issues

Whether the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence by boarding an overcrowded auto rickshaw? Whether the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal is excessive?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the deceased boarded an overcrowded auto rickshaw and thus contributed to the accident; compensation is excessive. Respondents argued that the accident was solely due to rash driving of the auto rickshaw driver; compensation is just and proper.

Ratio Decidendi

A passenger who boards an overcrowded vehicle contributes to the negligence and is liable for contributory negligence. The liability for compensation must be apportioned equally between the driver and the deceased passenger.

Judgment Excerpts

The deceased was also negligent in boarding an overcrowded auto rickshaw. In the circumstances, I hold that the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence to the extent of 50%. The multiplier of 13 applied by the Tribunal is correct as per the Second Schedule.

Procedural History

Claim petition filed before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati; award dated 30.12.2008; appeal filed by insurance company on 2009; heard and decided on 30.06.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 140
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased passenger was travelling in an auto-rickshaw which overturned due to rash driving; court found contributory ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Railway Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reduces Enhanced Compensation for Orange Trees Due to Lack of Evidence. Reference Court's enhancement of Rs.500 per tree set aside as unsupported by evidence; compensat...