Bombay High Court Allows Election of President of Communidade Despite Prior Service as Substitute Attorney — Interpretation of Articles 40 and 50 of Code of Comunidades, 1961. The Court held that mere election as substitute attorney without actual service does not disqualify a candidate from being elected as President for the next triennium.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Damodar R. Naik, was an able component of the Communidade of Sancoale. He was elected as substitute attorney on 3/12/2006 for the triennium 2007-2009 and took oath on 3/03/2007, but never actually acted as attorney during that triennium. Subsequently, he was elected as President of the Communidade on 6/01/2009 for the triennium 2010-2012. Respondent No.1 challenged this election before the Administrative Tribunal, which set aside the election on the ground that the petitioner was a member of the Managing Committee for the triennium 2007-2009 and therefore disqualified under Article 50 of the Code of Comunidades, 1961. The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court at Goa. The Court examined Articles 40, 41, and 50 of the Code. Article 40 states that the Managing Committee consists of a president, attorney, and treasurer. Article 41 provides for election of the Managing Committee from among able components. Article 50 (substituted) disqualifies persons who have 'already served as members of the Managing Committee' from being elected before the lapse of three years. The Court noted that the petitioner was elected as substitute attorney, which is a member of the Managing Committee, but he never served as attorney. The Court interpreted 'served as members' to mean actual functioning, not mere election or oath-taking. Since the petitioner never acted as attorney, he did not 'serve' as a member. The Court also considered that the petitioner's election as substitute attorney was for the triennium 2007-2009, but he never acted, so he was not a 'member who served'. The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Tribunal's order, and restored the petitioner's election as President.

Headnote

A) Interpretation of Statutes - Code of Comunidades - Articles 40 and 50 - Disqualification for Re-election - The issue was whether a substitute attorney who was a member of the Managing Committee for the triennium 2007-2009 but never acted as attorney is disqualified from being elected as President for the next triennium 2010-2012 under Article 50 of the Code of Comunidades, 1961. The Court held that Article 50 disqualifies only those who have 'already served as members of the Managing Committee' and that the petitioner, having been elected as substitute attorney but never having acted as attorney, did not 'serve' as a member. The Court distinguished between being a member and serving as a member, and held that the disqualification applies only to those who actually functioned as members. (Paras 7-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a person who served as a substitute attorney (member of Managing Committee) for a triennium but never acted as attorney is disqualified from being elected as President for the next triennium under Article 50 of the Code of Comunidades, 1961.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order of the Administrative Tribunal dated 12/03/2010, and restored the petitioner's election as President of the Communidade of Sancoale for the triennium 2010-2012.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of statutes
  • Election disqualification
  • Managing Committee membership
  • Substitute attorney
  • Code of Comunidades
  • 1961
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (06) 130

Writ Petition No.267 of 2010

2010-06-11

N.A. Britto, J.

Mr. D. Pangam for Petitioner, Mr. R. Rao for Respondent No.1

Shri Damodar R. Naik

Shri Pratap A. Mardolkar, Administrator of Communidades (South Goa), Communidade of Sancoale

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Administrative Tribunal setting aside election of petitioner as President of Communidade.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of Tribunal's order and restoration of his election as President.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's election as President was set aside on ground that he was a member of Managing Committee for previous triennium and thus disqualified under Article 50.

Previous Decisions

Administrative Tribunal by order dated 12/03/2010 set aside petitioner's election as President for triennium 2010-2012.

Issues

Whether the petitioner, having been elected as substitute attorney for the triennium 2007-2009 but never having acted as attorney, is disqualified from being elected as President for the next triennium under Article 50 of the Code of Comunidades, 1961.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he never served as a member of the Managing Committee because he never acted as attorney, and therefore Article 50 does not apply. Respondent No.1 argued that the petitioner was a member of the Managing Committee as substitute attorney and thus disqualified under Article 50.

Ratio Decidendi

The disqualification under Article 50 of the Code of Comunidades, 1961 applies only to persons who have 'already served as members of the Managing Committee'. Mere election as a substitute attorney without actual service does not constitute 'serving as a member'. The term 'served' implies actual functioning, not mere membership or oath-taking.

Judgment Excerpts

Persons who have already served as members of the Managing Committee shall not be elected, before the lapse of three years. The petitioner was elected as substitute attorney but never acted as attorney, and therefore did not serve as a member of the Managing Committee.

Procedural History

The petitioner was elected as substitute attorney on 3/12/2006 for triennium 2007-2009 and took oath on 3/03/2007 but never acted. He was elected as President on 6/01/2009 for triennium 2010-2012. Respondent No.1 challenged the election before the Administrative Tribunal, which set it aside on 12/03/2010. The petitioner then filed this writ petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Comunidades, 1961 (Legislative Diploma No.2070): Articles 39, 40, 41, 50
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Election of President of Communidade Despite Prior Service as Substitute Attorney — Interpretation of Articles 40 and 50 of Code of Comunidades, 1961. The Court held that mere election as substitute attorney without actual ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer of Police Officer — Transfer Held Not Punitive and Based on Administrative Reasons. The court upheld the transfer order under the Maharashtra Government Servants Regulation of Transfers and ...