Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Policy Validity and Breach of Conditions Not Proved. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation as No Defence Raised Before Tribunal and No Evidence of Policy Invalidity or Passenger Carriage in Goods Vehicle.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of deceased Wamanrao, who died in a road accident on 18 April 1994 when a matador (MH15B897) driven by respondent no.6 hit him from behind while he was walking on Viregaon-Ramnagar road. The claimants sought compensation of Rs.1,00,000. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna, allowed the petition and directed the opponents (owner-driver and insurer) to pay the awarded amount with costs and interest. The insurance company, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., appealed against the award, raising two grounds: first, that no valid insurance policy existed on the date of the accident; second, that the owner and driver breached policy conditions by carrying passengers in a goods vehicle, thus exonerating the insurer. The High Court examined the record and found that the insurance company had not raised these defences in its written statement before the Tribunal. The certificate of insurance showed no indication of invalidity, and no evidence was led to prove breach of conditions. The court held that the insurer cannot be allowed to raise new grounds for the first time in appeal without having pleaded or proved them at the trial. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the award of the Tribunal was upheld.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Insurance Policy - Validity - Burden of Proof - The insurer contended that no valid policy existed on the date of accident, but failed to raise this defence before the Tribunal or produce evidence to prove invalidity - Held that the insurer cannot be allowed to raise such a ground for the first time in appeal without supporting evidence (Paras 6-8).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Breach of Policy Conditions - Carrying Passengers in Goods Vehicle - The insurer alleged that the vehicle was a goods vehicle and passengers were carried, constituting breach - However, no such defence was pleaded before the Tribunal and no evidence was led - Held that the insurer cannot be exonerated on this ground in appeal (Paras 6-8).

C) Motor Accident Claims - Appeal - New Defences - The insurance company sought to raise new grounds in appeal that were not part of its written statement or defence before the Tribunal - Held that such grounds cannot be entertained for the first time in appeal, especially without any evidence on record (Paras 7-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurance company can be exonerated from liability on grounds that no valid policy existed and that there was breach of policy conditions by carrying passengers in a goods vehicle, when such defences were not raised before the Tribunal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna, dated 8 December 1995 in MACP No.23 of 1994 is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Burden of proof on insurer to establish breach of policy conditions
  • Insurance company cannot raise new defences on appeal not pleaded before Tribunal
  • Validity of insurance policy presumed unless challenged at trial
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (02) 9

First Appeal No.205 of 1996

2010-02-08

R.M.Borde

Mr.V.N.Upadhye for appellant, Mr.J.C.Badve for Respondents No.1 to 5

M/s New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

1 Mr.Bhujanga s/o Wamanrao Katkade, 2 Mr.Pralhad s/o Wamanrao Katkade, 3 Mr.Narayan s/o Wamanrao Katkade, 4 Ambadas s/o Wamanrao Katkade, 5 Smt.Padmabai w/o Wamanrao Katkade, 6 Mr.Sk.Shakuddin s/o Sk.Shamsuddin

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal granting compensation to claimants for death in motor accident.

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought to set aside the award and be exonerated from liability.

Filing Reason

Insurance company contended that no valid policy existed and that there was breach of policy conditions by carrying passengers in a goods vehicle.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna, allowed claim petition and directed opponents to pay Rs.1,00,000 with costs and interest on 8 December 1995.

Issues

Whether the insurance company can raise the defence of no valid policy for the first time in appeal? Whether the insurance company can be exonerated on ground of breach of policy conditions (carrying passengers in goods vehicle) when not pleaded before Tribunal?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company): No valid insurance policy existed on date of accident; owner/driver breached policy conditions by carrying passengers in goods vehicle, so insurer not liable. Respondents (Claimants): Defences not raised before Tribunal; no evidence to support contentions; appeal should be dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi

An insurance company cannot be allowed to raise new defences in appeal that were not pleaded or proved before the Tribunal. The burden to prove breach of policy conditions or invalidity of policy lies on the insurer, and failure to do so at trial precludes raising such grounds in appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

There is no defence raised by appellant – opponent no.1 and the contentions, those are advanced before this Court, were not at all part of defence of insurance company. On perusal of certificate of insurance of vehicle, there is nothing in the document to draw an inference that the policy was not in existence. The insurance company cannot be permitted to raise a contention for the first time in appeal that the policy was not in existence or that there was breach of condition of policy.

Procedural History

Claim petition (MACP No.23 of 1994) filed by respondents 1-5 before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna, which allowed the petition on 8 December 1995. Insurance company appealed to Bombay High Court (Bench at Aurangabad) vide First Appeal No.205 of 1996, which was dismissed on 8 February 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Policy Validity and Breach of Conditions Not Proved. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation as No Defence Raised Before Tribunal and No Evidence of Policy Invalidity or Pa...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Dereservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Reservation Lapses Due to Non-Acquisition Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. The court held that mere passing of a resolution for acquisition does not constitute steps ...