Bombay High Court Allows Claimant's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced to Rs. 2/- per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Sales and Potentiality for Non-Agricultural Use. The court held that the Reference Court erred in not applying the same market value as for nearby lands sold at Rs. 2/- to Rs. 3/- per sq. ft. under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Mahesh Bhagwandas Boob, owned land at Block No.7 in village Chikhali, admeasuring 40 R, which was acquired by a Notification dated 28.12.1989 for the purpose of gaothan (village settlement). The Sub-Divisional Officer/Land Acquisition Officer, Murtizapur, passed an Award on 18.3.1992 granting compensation at Rs. 5,200/- per acre. Dissatisfied, the appellant filed a Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which was registered as Land Acquisition Case No.36/1992. The Reference Court (2nd Additional District Judge, Akola) by judgment and order dated 19.6.1995 enhanced the compensation to Rs. 20,000/- per acre. Still aggrieved, the appellant filed the present First Appeal seeking enhancement to Rs. 50,000/- per acre. The appellant argued that the acquired land was located 1000 to 2000 feet away from Survey Nos. 32/5 and 37, which had been sold at Rs. 2/- to Rs. 3/- per sq. ft. between 1987 and 1990, and that the Reference Court had accepted the potentiality for non-agricultural use but failed to grant the same rate. The High Court, per R. K. Deshpande, J., heard the appeal and allowed it, holding that the Reference Court ought to have granted compensation at the rate of Rs. 2/- per sq. ft. (equivalent to Rs. 87,120/- per acre) based on the comparable sales and the potentiality of the land. The judgment was delivered on 4th January 2010.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Compensation Enhancement - Market Value Determination - Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 18, 23 - The appellant-claimant sought enhancement of compensation from Rs. 20,000/- per acre to Rs. 50,000/- per acre for land acquired for gaothan, relying on sales of nearby lands at Rs. 2/- to Rs. 3/- per sq. ft. - The High Court held that the Reference Court had accepted the potentiality for non-agricultural use but failed to apply the same rate as comparable sales - The appeal was allowed, and compensation was enhanced to Rs. 2/- per sq. ft. (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Reference Court erred in not granting compensation at the rate of Rs. 50,000/- per acre (or Rs. 2/- to Rs. 3/- per sq. ft.) for the acquired land, considering its potential for non-agricultural use and comparable sales of nearby lands.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The appellant/claimant is entitled to compensation at the rate of Rs. 2/- per sq. ft. for the acquired land. The judgment and order of the Reference Court dated 19.6.1995 is modified accordingly. The respondent shall pay the enhanced compensation with all statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act.

Law Points

  • Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
  • Section 18
  • Section 23
  • Compensation Enhancement
  • Market Value Determination
  • Potentiality for Non-Agricultural Use
  • Comparable Sales Method
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 189

First Appeal No.316 of 1996

2010-01-04

R. K. Deshpande, J.

Mr. V. P. Panpalia for Appellant, Mr. D. M. Kale, A. G. P. for Respondent

Mahesh Bhagwandas Boob

State of Maharashtra, through the Collector, Akola, (L.A.O. & S.D.O.), Murtizapur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First Appeal against judgment of Reference Court in land acquisition compensation matter.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation from Rs. 20,000/- per acre to Rs. 50,000/- per acre for acquired land.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with compensation awarded by Reference Court.

Previous Decisions

Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs. 5,200/- per acre on 18.3.1992; Reference Court enhanced to Rs. 20,000/- per acre on 19.6.1995.

Issues

Whether the Reference Court erred in not granting compensation at the rate of Rs. 2/- to Rs. 3/- per sq. ft. based on comparable sales of nearby lands? Whether the potentiality of the acquired land for non-agricultural use was properly considered?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the acquired land is located 1000 to 2000 feet away from Survey Nos. 32/5 and 37, which were sold at Rs. 2/- to Rs. 3/- per sq. ft. between 1987 and 1990, and the Reference Court accepted the potentiality for non-agricultural use but failed to grant the same price. Respondent (State) opposed the enhancement, but no specific arguments are recorded in the judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that when the Reference Court has accepted the potentiality of the acquired land for non-agricultural use and there is evidence of comparable sales of nearby lands at a higher rate, the same rate should be applied for determining market value under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Judgment Excerpts

The Reference Court, while enhancing the compensation relied upon the lands Survey Nos. 32/5 and Survey No.37 situated at village Chikhali which were sold @ Rs.2/- to Rs.3/- per sq. ft. between the year 1987 to 1990. According to Mr. Panpalia, Adv. the claimants have brought on record sufficient evidence which the Reference Court has accepted that the lands acquired possessed potentiality for non-agricultural use.

Procedural History

Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act dated 28.12.1989 for acquisition of land for gaothan. Award by Land Acquisition Officer on 18.3.1992 granting Rs. 5,200/- per acre. Reference under Section 18 filed by claimant, registered as LAC No.36/1992. Reference Court judgment on 19.6.1995 enhancing compensation to Rs. 20,000/- per acre. Present First Appeal filed on 1996, decided on 4.1.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 18, 23
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Claimant's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced to Rs. 2/- per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Sales and Potentiality for Non-Agricultural Use. The court held that the Reference Court erred in not applying th...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of PSI Appointment for Lack of Driving License on Cut-off Date. Essential Qualification Must Be Possessed by Cut-off Date, Not Subsequently Acquired.