Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Rate from Rs.60,000 to Rs.75,000 per Hectare. Court Relies on Sale Instances and Previous Judgment to Determine Market Value Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Shrikrishna Kashiram Lokhandkar, owned land bearing Gat No.13 admeasuring 1 H 60 acres in Awar, Tah. Khamgaon, District Buldana. A notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued on 5.7.1990 for acquisition of the land for a Minor Irrigation Tank. The Land Acquisition Officer passed an award on 24.8.1992 granting compensation at Rs.9,845/- per acre. Dissatisfied, the appellant sought a reference under Section 18 of the Act, which was decided by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Khamgaon on 22.11.1995 in Land Acquisition Case No.58 of 1992. The Reference Court enhanced compensation to Rs.60,000/- per hectare. The appellant appealed to the High Court, seeking further enhancement to Rs.75,000/- per hectare. The appellant argued that the Reference Court ignored sale instances from villages Sutala, Parkhed, Ghatpuri, Januna, and Khamgaon (Exhs.20-22, 34-38, 32-33, 27-31, 24), a valuer's report (Exh.83), and a judgment of this Court in First Appeal No.8 of 1984. The respondent State supported the Reference Court's findings. The High Court, per R. K. Deshpande, J., held that the Reference Court had not properly considered the sale instances and the previous judgment, which indicated a market value of Rs.75,000 per hectare. The Court partly allowed the appeal, enhancing compensation to Rs.75,000 per hectare, with proportionate costs and interest as per the Act.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Compensation - Market Value - Determination - Sections 4, 18, 23 Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - The appellant sought enhancement of compensation from Rs.60,000 per hectare to Rs.75,000 per hectare for land acquired for a Minor Irrigation Tank. The High Court, relying on sale instances from neighbouring villages and a previous judgment of the same Court, held that the Reference Court had ignored relevant evidence and that the market value should be fixed at Rs.75,000 per hectare. The appeal was partly allowed. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Reference Court erred in not granting compensation at the rate of Rs.75,000/- per hectare for the acquired land based on the sale instances and other evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Compensation enhanced from Rs.60,000 per hectare to Rs.75,000 per hectare. Proportionate costs and interest as per the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Law Points

  • Land acquisition compensation
  • market value determination
  • reliance on sale instances
  • previous judgments as evidence
  • enhancement of compensation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 169

First Appeal No. 289 of 1996

2010-01-06

R. K. Deshpande, J.

Mr. Anil Kilor for appellant, Mr. D. B. Yengal (A.G.P.) for respondent

Shrikrishna Kashiram Lokhandkar

State of Maharashtra, Through Collector, Buldana

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment of Reference Court in land acquisition compensation case.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation from Rs.60,000 per hectare to Rs.75,000 per hectare.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the compensation awarded by the Reference Court.

Previous Decisions

Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs.9,845 per acre on 24.8.1992; Reference Court enhanced to Rs.60,000 per hectare on 22.11.1995.

Issues

Whether the Reference Court erred in not granting compensation at Rs.75,000 per hectare based on sale instances and previous judgment.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that sale instances (Exhs.20-22, 34-38, 32-33, 27-31, 24), valuer's report (Exh.83), and judgment in First Appeal No.8 of 1984 were ignored by the Reference Court. Respondent supported the Reference Court's findings, stating there was no evidence to substantiate higher compensation.

Ratio Decidendi

The market value of acquired land should be determined based on sale instances of comparable lands and previous court judgments, and the Reference Court erred in ignoring such evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal challenges the judgment and order dt. 22.11.1995 passed by learned Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Khamgaon in Land Acquisition Case No.58 of 1992 to the extent it refuses to grant compensation for acquisition of land in question to the claimants @ Rs.75,000/- per acre. The appeal is partly allowed. The compensation for acquisition of land is enhanced from Rs.60,000/- per hectare to Rs.75,000/- per hectare.

Procedural History

Notification under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act on 5.7.1990; Land Acquisition Officer's award on 24.8.1992 at Rs.9,845 per acre; Reference under Section 18 decided on 22.11.1995 enhancing compensation to Rs.60,000 per hectare; present appeal filed on 1996; decided on 6.1.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4, Section 18, Section 23
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Rate from Rs.60,000 to Rs.75,000 per Hectare. Court Relies on Sale Instances and Previous Judgment to Determine Market Value Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Coastal Zone Management Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Order Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 4(3a) of Environment Protection Rules, 1986, and Respondent Directed to Hear Petitioner...