Bombay High Court Directs Government to Decide Prisoner's Premature Release Proposal Within Eight Weeks — Petitioner Claims Age of 65 Years Entitles Release Under Government Resolution Dated 10.1.2006. The court directed the Government to consider the pending proposal for premature release in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Kishan Bhimaji Jagdale, a prisoner, sent a communication from jail which was registered as a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. The limited grievance of the petitioner was that he had completed the age of 65 years and was therefore entitled to be released prematurely. An application recommending his premature release had been forwarded to the competent authorities in February 2009. The affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondent State of Maharashtra indicated at paragraph 9 that the proposal for premature release was pending consideration with the Government. The petitioner had also submitted a birth certificate from competent authorities to prove his age. Since the proposal was pending, the High Court allowed the petition to the limited extent of directing the Government to decide the proposal in accordance with law, particularly in accordance with the Government resolution dated 10.1.2006 and any subsequent resolutions, within eight weeks from the date of the order. The court also directed that the decision be communicated to the petitioner. The rule was made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. The court quantified the fees payable to the appointed counsel for the petitioner at Rs. 2000/-.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Premature Release - Age of 65 Years - Government Resolution Dated 10.1.2006 - Petitioner claimed entitlement to premature release upon attaining 65 years of age - Proposal for premature release was pending consideration with the Government - Court directed the Government to decide the proposal in accordance with law, particularly the resolution dated 10.1.2006, within eight weeks - Held that the Government must consider the proposal expeditiously and communicate the decision to the petitioner (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, who has completed 65 years of age, is entitled to premature release under the Government resolution dated 10.1.2006, and whether the Government must decide the pending proposal expeditiously.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed to the limited extent of directing the Government to decide the petitioner's proposal for premature release in accordance with law, particularly the Government resolution dated 10.1.2006 and any subsequent resolutions, within eight weeks from the date of the order, and communicate the decision to the petitioner. Rule made absolute with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Premature release
  • Government resolution
  • Age of 65 years
  • Pending proposal
  • Direction to decide
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 145

Criminal Writ Petition No.1072 of 2009

2010-01-07

P.V. Hardas, Shrihari P. Davare

Miss Shobha Adkine (for petitioner), Shri K.S. Patil (A.P.P. for respondent)

Kishan Bhimaji Jagdale

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition seeking direction for premature release of a prisoner who has completed 65 years of age.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought premature release on the ground of having completed 65 years of age.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's proposal for premature release was pending consideration with the Government, and he sought a direction for its expeditious decision.

Previous Decisions

An application recommending premature release was forwarded to competent authorities in February 2009, but no decision had been communicated.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to premature release upon completing 65 years of age under the Government resolution dated 10.1.2006. Whether the Government must decide the pending proposal for premature release expeditiously.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he has completed 65 years of age and submitted a birth certificate, and his proposal for premature release is pending with the Government. Respondent State submitted that the proposal is pending consideration with the Government.

Ratio Decidendi

When a proposal for premature release of a prisoner is pending consideration with the Government, the court can direct the Government to decide the proposal expeditiously in accordance with law, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim.

Judgment Excerpts

The limited grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that the petitioner has completed the age of 65 years and, therefore, is entitled to be released prematurely. Since the proposal of the petitioner is pending consideration with the Government, we allow this petition to the limited extent of directing the Government to decide the said proposal in accordance with law particularly in accordance with the resolution of the Government, dated 10.1.2006 and such further resolutions if any, which may have been issued thereafter, within eight weeks from today and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner.

Procedural History

The petitioner sent a communication from jail which was registered as Criminal Writ Petition No.1072 of 2009. The court appointed an advocate for the petitioner. The petition was heard finally at the stage of admission with consent of counsel.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Government to Decide Prisoner's Premature Release Proposal Within Eight Weeks — Petitioner Claims Age of 65 Years Entitles Release Under Government Resolution Dated 10.1.2006. The court directed the Government to consider ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Acquittal of Co-accused Maintained Due to Lack of Evidence of Common Intention.