Bombay High Court Directs Provisional Appointment of Caste Claimant Pending Scrutiny Committee Decision. The Court held that a selected candidate can be provisionally appointed subject to an undertaking to refund benefits if the caste claim is invalidated.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ku. Sangita Madan Ingle, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur seeking a direction for her provisional appointment to the post of Talathi, for which she had been selected, pending verification of her caste claim by the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee. The petitioner was aged 20 years and belonged to Dongershevali, Tq. Chikhali, District Buldhana. The respondents included the State of Maharashtra, the Collector of Buldhana, and the Scrutiny Committee. The Court, after hearing the parties, issued a rule returnable forthwith and disposed of the petition with consent. The Court directed the Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner's caste claim within six months from the date fixed before the committee. In the interim, the Court directed the respondents to provisionally appoint the petitioner, who was admittedly selected for the post of Talathi, upon her furnishing an undertaking that she would not claim any benefit if her caste claim was not validated by the committee in accordance with Government Resolution No. STC-1006/PK 102/K.10 dated 30.8.2006. The Court made no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Caste Certificate Verification - Provisional Appointment - The petitioner, selected for the post of Talathi, sought provisional appointment pending verification of her caste claim by the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee - The Court directed the Committee to decide the caste claim within six months and ordered the respondents to provisionally appoint the petitioner upon her undertaking that she would not claim any benefit if her claim is not validated - Held that provisional appointment can be granted subject to the outcome of the scrutiny and an undertaking to refund benefits if the claim is invalidated (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a candidate selected for a post can be provisionally appointed pending verification of her caste claim by the Scrutiny Committee.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court directed the Caste Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claim within six months. In the meanwhile, the respondents shall provisionally appoint the petitioner upon her undertaking that she will not claim any benefit if her claim is not validated. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Provisional appointment pending caste scrutiny
  • undertaking to refund benefits if claim invalidated
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 20

Writ Petition No.5645 of 2009

2010-01-11

S.A. Bobde, Vasanti A. Naik

Shri A.P. Kalmegh for petitioner, Shri S.S. Doifode for respondents

Ku. Sangita Madan Ingle

State of Maharashtra, Collector Buldhana, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking provisional appointment pending caste scrutiny

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to provisionally appoint the petitioner as Talathi pending decision of caste claim by Scrutiny Committee

Filing Reason

Petitioner was selected for the post of Talathi but not appointed due to pending caste verification

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to provisional appointment pending verification of her caste claim by the Scrutiny Committee

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she was selected for the post of Talathi and should be provisionally appointed pending caste scrutiny Respondents did not oppose the provisional appointment subject to undertaking

Ratio Decidendi

A candidate selected for a post can be provisionally appointed pending verification of caste claim, subject to an undertaking to refund benefits if the claim is invalidated.

Judgment Excerpts

The Caste Scrutiny Committee is directed to decide the caste-claim of the petitioner within a period of 6 months from the date fixed before the committee. In the meanwhile, we direct that the respondents shall provisionally appoint the petitioner who is admittedly selected for the post of Talathi upon obtaining an undertaking from her that she will not claim any benefit, if her claim is not validated by the committed in accordance with the government resolution No. STC-1006/PK 102/K.10 dated 30.8.2006.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.5645 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The Court issued rule returnable forthwith and heard the parties by consent. The petition was disposed of on 11th January 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Government Resolution: No. STC-1006/PK 102/K.10 dated 30.8.2006
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Provisional Appointment of Caste Claimant Pending Scrutiny Committee Decision. The Court held that a selected candidate can be provisionally appointed subject to an undertaking to refund benefits if the caste claim is invali...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Transfer Application in Domestic Violence Case with Costs for Frivolous Litigation. Court warns that filing transfer applications without merit amounts to abuse of process and imposes costs of Rs. 25,000.