Search Results for "Talathi"

198 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 198 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution Failed to Establish Demand and Acceptance of Rs. 800 Bribe Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Dnyanoba Wamanrao Jadhav, a Talathi, who was charged under the Prevention of Corrupt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vikas Baburao Marathe, a Talathi (revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dattatraya Laxman Bagdi, a Talathi working at Dundage, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadhinglaj, for offences under Sections 7 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Appasaheb Narayan Jadhav, a Talathi (public servant) in Dafalapur, Sangli, was convicted by the Special Judge, Sangli, for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Selection Process in District Beed Recruitment Due to Malpractices. Selection Committee Has Power to Cancel Vitiated Process Even If Some Candidates Are Innocent.

The petitioners, four individuals who were selected for clerical and Talathi posts in a recruitment process conducted by the District Selection Commit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Advocate in Forgery Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence — Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC Not Attracted as No Specific Allegation of Dishonest Inducement or Forgery Against Applicant.

The applicant, Mohan Premnath Kothimbire, an advocate practicing in Additional Sessions Court, Omerga, was arrayed as accused No.7 in R.C.C. No.11/200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

The case involves a dispute regarding a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kasbe Sukene, Taluka Niphad, District Nashi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Yavatmal, appealed against the judgment and order dated 24/01/2002 passed by the learned...