High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in KSRTC Conductor Dismissal Case — Sets Aside Single Judge Order and Directs Settlement of Benefits. Legal Representatives of Deceased Workman Entitled to Back Wages and Other Benefits from Date of Dismissal Till Death Despite Upheld Dismissal.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by the legal representatives of a deceased workman, Sri B.K. Gulbal (originally Bhimappa Gulabal), who was employed as a conductor with the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC), Belagavi Division. The workman was dismissed from service, and he challenged the dismissal by filing a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka. During the pendency of the writ petition, the workman died on 13.08.2013. His legal representatives, namely his wife Smt. Laxmibai and two children, were brought on record. The learned Single Judge, by order dated 14.08.2015, dismissed the writ petition, thereby upholding the dismissal. Aggrieved by this order, the legal representatives filed the present writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961. The core legal issue was whether the legal representatives of the deceased workman were entitled to any benefits from the date of dismissal till the date of death, despite the dismissal being upheld. The appellants argued that the workman had died during the pendency of the proceedings and that the legal representatives should be entitled to settlement of all benefits payable to the deceased workman from the date of dismissal till his death. The respondent, KSRTC, opposed the appeal. The Division Bench, comprising Dr. Justice Vineet Kothari and Dr. Justice H.B. Prabhakara Sastry, allowed the appeal. The court held that although the dismissal was upheld, the legal representatives were entitled to the settlement of all benefits payable to the deceased workman from the date of dismissal till his death. The court directed the respondent to settle all such benefits accordingly. The judgment was delivered on 31.05.2017.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Dismissal - Back Wages - Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 - The appeal was filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition and upholding the dismissal of the workman from service as conductor in KSRTC. The workman died during the pendency of the proceedings. The Division Bench held that the legal representatives are entitled to settlement of all benefits payable to the deceased workman from the date of dismissal till his death, despite the dismissal being upheld. (Paras 1-3)

B) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 11-A - Power of Labour Courts and Tribunals to give appropriate relief - The court considered the power to grant relief in cases of dismissal and the entitlement of legal representatives to benefits accrued during the period from dismissal to death. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the legal representatives of a deceased workman are entitled to back wages and other benefits from the date of dismissal till the date of death, when the dismissal was upheld but the workman died during the pendency of proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ appeal is allowed. The order of the learned Single Judge dated 14.08.2015 is set aside. The respondent is directed to settle all the benefits payable to the deceased workman from the date of dismissal till his death.

Law Points

  • Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act
  • 1961
  • Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • Section 11-A
  • Workman's right to back wages upon reinstatement
  • Legal representatives' entitlement to benefits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (05) 7

WA No.100831/2015 (L-TER)

2017-05-31

Dr. Justice Vineet Kothari, Dr. Justice H. B. Prabhakara Sastry

Sri Ravi Hegde (for appellants), Sri Shivakumar S. Badawadagi (for respondent)

Smt. Laxmibai w/o. Bhimappa Gulabal and others (Legal representatives of deceased Sri B.K. Gulbal)

The Management of KSRTC, Belagavi Division

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against order of Single Judge dismissing writ petition challenging dismissal from service.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of Single Judge order and direction to respondent to settle all benefits payable to deceased workman from date of dismissal till his death.

Filing Reason

The workman was dismissed from service as conductor in KSRTC; his legal representatives sought benefits from dismissal till death after his death during pendency of proceedings.

Previous Decisions

Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on 14.08.2015, upholding the dismissal.

Issues

Whether the legal representatives of a deceased workman are entitled to back wages and other benefits from the date of dismissal till the date of death, when the dismissal was upheld but the workman died during the pendency of proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the workman died during pendency of proceedings and legal representatives should be entitled to settlement of all benefits from dismissal till death. Respondent opposed the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The legal representatives of a deceased workman are entitled to settlement of all benefits payable from the date of dismissal till the date of death, even if the dismissal is upheld, as the workman died during the pendency of proceedings and the benefits accrued during that period should be paid to the legal heirs.

Judgment Excerpts

This writ appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge on 14.08.2015, dismissing the writ petition filed by the workman, upholding his dismissal from service as conductor in the respondent – KSRTC. The appellant-petitioner Mr. Bhimappa Gulabal, has expired on 13.08.2013 and is now representing by his legal representatives Smt. Laxmibai, his wife and two children. The appeal is allowed. The order of the learned Single Judge dated 14.08.2015 is set aside. The respondent is directed to settle all the benefits payable to the deceased workman from the date of dismissal till his death.

Procedural History

The workman filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging his dismissal from service. During the pendency of the writ petition, the workman died on 13.08.2013. His legal representatives were brought on record. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on 14.08.2015, upholding the dismissal. The legal representatives then filed the present writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, which was allowed by the Division Bench on 31.05.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in KSRTC Conductor Dismissal Case — Sets Aside Single Judge Order and Directs Settlement of Benefits. Legal Representatives of Deceased Workman Entitled to Back Wages and Other Benefits from Date of Dismis...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Correction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Petitioners' challenge to correction of revenue records fails as they were not parties to the original proceeding and no notice...