High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Accused No.2 in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case for Lack of Incriminating Material. Petitioner, a proprietor of a firm, was not named in the complaint and no specific allegations were made against him regarding sale of misbranded drugs under Section 18(A)(vi) and Section 27(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vishwanath S/o Doddabasappa Kadli, was accused No.2 in CC No.369/2023 pending before the Court of Civil Judge and JMFC, Laxmeshwar, Gadag District, arising out of PCR No.25/2023. The case was registered for offences punishable under Section 18(A)(vi) and Section 27(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking quashing of the entire proceedings against him. The main contention of the petitioner was that the complaint did not name him nor contain any specific allegations against him. The respondent-State opposed the petition. The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad, after hearing the parties, observed that the complaint and the entire charge sheet material did not contain any incriminating material against the petitioner. The court held that continuing the proceedings against the petitioner would be an abuse of the process of law. Accordingly, the court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.2 in CC No.369/2023.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Proceedings - Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Lack of Incriminating Material - The petitioner, accused No.2, sought quashing of proceedings in CC No.369/2023 for offences under Section 18(A)(vi) and Section 27(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The complaint did not name the petitioner nor contain any specific allegations against him. The court held that continuing proceedings against the petitioner would be an abuse of process of law and quashed the same. (Paras 1-5)

B) Drugs and Cosmetics Act - Offences by Companies - Section 34 - Vicarious Liability - The court noted that vicarious liability under Section 34 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 requires specific averments against the person sought to be made liable. In the absence of any such averments, the proceedings against the petitioner were liable to be quashed. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.2 can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. when there is no specific allegation or incriminating material against him in the complaint.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The entire proceedings in CC No.369/2023 pending before the Court of Civil Judge and JMFC, Laxmeshwar, Gadag District, arising out of PCR No.25/2023, are quashed insofar as the petitioner/accused No.2 is concerned.

Law Points

  • Quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
  • Lack of incriminating material against accused
  • Vicarious liability not automatic
  • Drugs and Cosmetics Act
  • 1940
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (09) 64

CRL.P No. 103433 of 2024

2025-09-26

S.Vishwajith Shetty

Sunil S. Desai, Girija S. Hiremath

Vishwanath S/o Doddabasappa Kadli

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of proceedings in a drugs and cosmetics case.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of entire proceedings in CC No.369/2023 against the petitioner/accused No.2.

Filing Reason

The petitioner was arraigned as accused No.2 in a complaint for offences under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, but the complaint did not name him nor contain any specific allegations against him.

Issues

Whether the criminal proceedings against the petitioner can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. when there is no specific allegation or incriminating material against him.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the complaint does not name him and there are no specific allegations against him. Respondent-State opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the complaint and charge sheet material do not contain any incriminating material against the accused, continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, and the proceedings are liable to be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Judgment Excerpts

Accused No.2 is before this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings in CC No.369/2023... The complaint and the entire charge sheet material do not contain any incriminating material against the petitioner. Continuing the proceedings against the petitioner would be an abuse of the process of law.

Procedural History

The petitioner/accused No.2 filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 BNSS before the High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad seeking quashing of proceedings in CC No.369/2023 arising out of PCR No.25/2023. The petition was heard and reserved for orders on 12.09.2025, and the order was pronounced on 26.09.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 482
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS): 528
  • Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940: 18(A)(vi), 27(d), 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Accused No.2 in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case for Lack of Incriminating Material. Petitioner, a proprietor of a firm, was not named in the complaint and no specific allegations were made against him ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder by Burning Wife — Dying Declaration Found Credible. Life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC and three years under Section 498-A IPC confirmed.