High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Enquiry Notice Under Section 64 of Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 Due to Pending Re-Audit. Re-audit under Section 63 must be completed before initiating enquiry under Section 64; notice set aside as premature.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Bherya Primary Agriculture Credit Co-operative Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a notice of enquiry dated 26.09.2024 issued by the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies (respondent No.3) under Section 64 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959. The petitioner's grievance was that a re-audit under Section 63 of the Act had already been ordered on 25.10.2023, and therefore, the parallel enquiry under Section 64 was premature and unsustainable. The court examined the provisions and noted that Section 63 deals with re-audit, while Section 64 deals with enquiry into the affairs of a society. The court observed that the re-audit process must be completed before an enquiry under Section 64 can be initiated, as the two are sequential steps. Since the re-audit was already ordered and pending, the notice of enquiry under Section 64 was held to be premature. The court allowed the petition, quashed the notice dated 26.09.2024, and granted liberty to the respondents to proceed with an enquiry under Section 64 after the completion of the re-audit under Section 63.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Enquiry under Section 64 - Re-audit under Section 63 - The petitioner society challenged a notice of enquiry under Section 64 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 issued by the Assistant Registrar on 26.09.2024, when a re-audit under Section 63 had already been ordered on 25.10.2023. The court held that the re-audit process must be completed before any enquiry under Section 64 can be initiated, as the two provisions are sequential. The notice was quashed with liberty to proceed after re-audit. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a notice of enquiry under Section 64 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 can be sustained when a re-audit under Section 63 of the Act has already been ordered.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The notice bearing No.SaNi-43/Adalitha/64 enquiry/CR-26/2024-25 dated 26.09.2024 passed by respondent No.3 (Annexure-B) is quashed. Liberty is reserved to the respondents to proceed with an enquiry under Section 64 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 after the completion of the re-audit under Section 63 of the Act.

Law Points

  • Section 64 enquiry cannot be initiated when re-audit under Section 63 is already ordered
  • Re-audit and enquiry under Section 64 are distinct but sequential processes
  • Notice of enquiry without completion of re-audit is premature and liable to be quashed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (03) 27

WP No. 6459 of 2025 (CS-RES)

2025-03-07

Suraj Govindaraj

NC: 2025:KHC:9928

Sandesh T.B. for petitioner, Yogesh D. Naik for respondents

Bherya Primary Agriculture Credit Co-operative Society Ltd

State of Karnataka, Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Joint Director of Audit

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a notice of enquiry under Section 64 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the notice dated 26.09.2024 issued by respondent No.3.

Filing Reason

The notice of enquiry under Section 64 was issued despite a re-audit under Section 63 having already been ordered on 25.10.2023.

Issues

Whether a notice of enquiry under Section 64 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 can be sustained when a re-audit under Section 63 has already been ordered.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the re-audit under Section 63 was already ordered on 25.10.2023, and therefore, the enquiry under Section 64 is premature and unsustainable. Respondents did not file objections; learned AGA accepted notice.

Ratio Decidendi

A re-audit under Section 63 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 must be completed before an enquiry under Section 64 can be initiated. Initiating an enquiry under Section 64 while a re-audit is pending is premature and the notice is liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The grievance of the petitioner is that a notice of enquiry under Section 64 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 has been ordered by respondent No.3-Asst. Registrar of Cooperative Societies on 26.09.2024 at Annexure-B when a re-audit had already been ordered on 25.10.2023. In view of the above, the notice of enquiry under Section 64 of the Act is premature and cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru on an unspecified date. The petition came up for preliminary hearing on 07.03.2025, and the court passed the order allowing the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959: Section 63, Section 64
  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Enquiry Notice Under Section 64 of Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 Due to Pending Re-Audit. Re-audit under Section 63 must be completed before initiating enquiry under Section 64; notice...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Interim Custody of Seized Cattle to Claimed Owners in Animal Cruelty Case — Courts Below Erred in Rejecting Custody Without Considering Conditional Release. Pending trial under Section 11(1)(d) of Prevention of Cruelty to A...